Search Results for "Age of victim"

39 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 39 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consensual Relationship. The court held that at the bail stage, a prima facie case is to be seen, and since the victim supported the accused and age was disputed, bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar K.S., accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking ba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consent. The court found that the victim's age was disputed and she was a consenting party, weakening the prosecution's case under POCSO Act and IPC.

The petitioner, Sri Prasanna Kumar, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime No.83/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Considering Consensual Relationship and Age Discrepancy. The court held that the victim was aware of the consequences and the relationship was consensual, thus the accused is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

The petitioner, Parashurama Kondannanavar, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail in Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Sections 363, 377, 323 IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Pankaj Dadarao Ambadkar, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-1 & Special Judge, Achalpur in Special (POCSO) Case No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Age of Victim and Offence Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ganesh Palaspagar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati for offences under Sections 363, 366, and 376 IPC. The pros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rape and Kidnapping Case Due to Unproven Age and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Sections 376, 363, 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim's Minority and Credible Evidence.

The case involves an appeal by Subhash Bharsakle and his mother Leelabai against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Akot, in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Age. Conviction under Sections 363 and 366 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Victim Was Below 18 Years and That Taking Was Without Consent.

The appellants, Rohidas Laxman Malge and Vilas Sopanrao Landge, were convicted by the trial court under Sections 363 and 366 read with Section 34 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abduction Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Evidence Found Unreliable and Medical Evidence Not Supporting Rape.

The appellant, Ratan @ Vishvajit Manoranjan Bose, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 363, 366...