Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in POCSO Case Due to Age Discrepancy and Consensual Relationship. The court held that at the bail stage, a prima facie case is to be seen, and since the victim supported the accused and age was disputed, bail was granted under Section 439 CrPC.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 78
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Arvind Kumar K.S., accused No.1, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail in Crime No.12/2018 registered by Rajajinagar Police Station, Bengaluru, for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366, 366A, 344, and 376 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and Sections 4, 6, and 16 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act). The case arose from a missing complaint lodged by the victim's mother on 14.01.2018, alleging that her 3rd daughter was missing. The victim was later recovered, and during investigation, it was revealed that she had been in a relationship with the accused and had voluntarily accompanied him. The victim's age was disputed: school records showed she was 17 years old, while medical opinion suggested she was 18 years. The victim, in her statement under Section 164 CrPC, supported the accused and stated that she had gone with him voluntarily. The learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the victim was a major and the relationship was consensual, and that the accused had been in custody since 18.01.2018. The State opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences. The court, after hearing both sides, noted that the victim's age was not conclusively established and that she had supported the accused. The court held that at the bail stage, a prima facie case is to be considered, and since the victim was allegedly a consenting party, the accused was entitled to bail. The court allowed the petition and granted bail to the accused on certain conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - POCSO Act, 2012 - Age of Victim - The court considered the discrepancy in the victim's age as per school records (17 years) and medical opinion (18 years) and the fact that the victim and accused were in a consensual relationship, leading to grant of bail. (Paras 3-6)

B) Criminal Law - Bail - Section 439 CrPC - Prima Facie Case - The court held that at the stage of bail, a prima facie case is to be seen, and since the victim supported the accused and there was no evidence of force, bail was granted. (Paras 5-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the accused is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC in a case involving offences under IPC and POCSO Act, considering the victim's age and alleged consensual relationship.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Accused No.1 shall be released on bail on executing a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties, subject to conditions including not tampering with evidence and appearing before court.

Law Points

  • Bail under Section 439 CrPC
  • POCSO Act
  • Age of victim
  • Consensual relationship
  • Prima facie case
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2020 LawText (KAR) (09) 83

Criminal Petition No.3672/2020

2020-09-01

B.A.Patil

Sri K.B.K.Swamy (for petitioner), Sri Rohith B.J., HCGP (for respondent)

Arvind Kumar K.S.

The State of Karnataka

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal bail petition under Section 439 CrPC

Remedy Sought

Enlargement of petitioner-accused No.1 on bail in Crime No.12/2018

Filing Reason

Accused was in custody since 18.01.2018 for alleged offences under IPC and POCSO Act

Issues

Whether the accused is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC considering the victim's age and alleged consensual relationship.

Submissions/Arguments

Learned counsel for petitioner argued that victim was a major and relationship was consensual, and accused had been in custody since 18.01.2018. Learned HCGP opposed bail citing seriousness of offences.

Ratio Decidendi

At the stage of bail, a prima facie case is to be seen. Since the victim's age was disputed and she supported the accused, indicating a consensual relationship, the accused is entitled to bail under Section 439 CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The genesis of the case of the prosecution in brief is that on 14.1.2018 the mother of the victim girl lodged a missing complaint... The victim girl in her statement recorded under Section 164 of Cr.P.C. has supported the case of the petitioner-accused No.1...

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 439 CrPC for bail in Crime No.12/2018 (Spl.C.C.No.290/2018) pending before LIV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. Heard and reserved on 26.08.2020, order pronounced on 01.09.2020.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 439
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 363, 366, 366A, 344, 376
  • Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012: 4, 6, 16
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal by Purchaser Against High Court Decision That Compromise Decree Does Not Bind Coparceners. Property Reacquired by Coparceners Through Court Decree Retains Joint Family Character, Requiring Consent of All Coparceners for...
Related Judgement
High Court Karnataka High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in Chit Business Dispute Involving Rape and Cheating Allegations — Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Consensual Relationship and Civil Dispute