Search Results for "Additional premium"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "Additional premium"

565 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 565 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Statutory Bar Permits Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants Paid Premium for Extra FSI but Abandoned Project; Court Held Retention of Premium Without Benefit Amounts to Unjust Enrichment.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Premium Paid Under ULC Act Government Resolution — Petitioner Cannot Claim Refund After Voluntarily Availing Benefit and Selling Land to Third Parties.

13 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Sudarshan Chemical Industries Ltd., was a beneficiary of an exemption order dated 29 February 1980 under Section 20(1) of the Urban La...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Excess One-Time Premium in ULC Act Repeal Case — Premium Chargeable Only on Exempted Surplus Vacant Land. The court held that the one-time premium under the 2019 GR and 2021 GR cannot be levied on retainable land, only on exempted surplus land under Section 20 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976.

7 Aug 2024

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.429/1/2 and CTS No.1069-A/A-1 and 1069-A/B-1, sought a refund of Rs.2,66,75,750/- paid as one-time p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Accident Victim and Fixes Liability on Insurance Company in Motor Vehicle Accident Case. Claimant sustained grievous injuries due to driver's negligence; Insurance Company held liable as no evidence of invalid license.

2 Dec 2020

The case involves an appeal filed by the claimant under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated 27.06...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows CMDA Appeal in Premium FSI Charges Dispute — Guideline Value Prevailing on Date of Approval Governs Levy. Builder's Application for Additional FSI Does Not Confer Right to Pre-Revised Rate.

11 Dec 2019

The appellant, Chennai Metropolitan Development Authority (CMDA), challenged the judgment of the Division Bench of the Madras High Court which directe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

26 Jul 2018

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Insurance Dispute — Floater Policy Interpretation Upheld. Court remits issue of loss assessment for reconsideration under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Oct 2015

The petitioner, M/s. Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, had obtained a Fire and Special Perils Policy from the respondent, National Insurance Company Li...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Premium on Staircase and Lift Areas Under D.C. Regulations — Levy at Revised Land Rate Upheld. The court held that the Municipal Corporation can charge premium for exempted FSI areas at the prevailing land rate, and the petitioners have no vested right to the earlier rate.

10 Jun 2010

The petitioners, M/s. Buildarch and its partner, owned a property at Prabhadevi, Mumbai, and sought to redevelop it. They submitted plans and paid var...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank of Baroda's Challenge to MMRDA's Demand for Additional Premium for FSI Enhancement in Bandra-Kurla Complex Lease. Lease Agreement Interpretation - Clause 13 of Agreement to Lease Does Not Confer Unilateral Right to Additional FSI Without Payment of Additional Premium as Per MMRDA's Policy.

2 Mar 2010

The petitioners, Bank of Baroda and its Deputy General Manager, filed a writ petition challenging the demand of the Mumbai Metropolitan Regional Devel...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)