Search Results for "Abatement of suit"

10 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 10 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Implead Legal Representatives in Partition Suit — Held That Application Under Order 22 Rule 4 CPC Was Not Maintainable as Defendant No.2 Was Already on Record and No Abatement Had Occurred

The petitioner, Sri Janardhana Suvarna, was Defendant No.2 in O.S.No.233/2016, a suit for partition and separate possession filed by Respondent No.1 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Condonation of Delay Application in Suit Abatement Case. The court upheld the concurrent findings that the delay of 7 years in seeking to set aside abatement was not sufficiently explained and the application was rightly dismissed.

The petitioner, Govind Jagalpure, challenged the judgment and order dated 21 November 2017 passed by the learned District Judge-1, Udgir, in Misc. Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Restoration of Suit for Partition Despite Abatement Order — Trial Court Erred in Holding Suit Abated When Legal Representatives Were Already on Record. The Court set aside the rejection of IA No.9 and directed restoration of IA No.7 for fresh consideration.

The petitioner, M/s J.C.Gupta & Sons, a registered firm, was the plaintiff in a civil suit for partition and separate possession of plaint schedule pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Impleadment in Estate Administration Suit. Suit for Administration of Estate Does Not Abate on Death of Plaintiff, Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted.

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 20th March 2013, rejecting the appellant's application to be i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Bring Legal Heirs on Record After 24-Year Delay in Specific Performance Suit. Condonation of Delay Refused as Plaintiff's Mistaken Belief Does Not Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Order 22 Rule 9 CPC.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by the plaintiff (Sunil Gupta) in a suit filed in 1989 for specific performance of an agreement dated 15...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...