Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Impleadment in Estate Administration Suit. Suit for Administration of Estate Does Not Abate on Death of Plaintiff, Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 26
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal arose from an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 20th March 2013, rejecting the appellant's application to be impleaded as a plaintiff in Suit No. 1240 of 1989. The suit was originally filed by Dominic Francis Pereira on 15th April 1989 against Joseph Pereira and others, seeking declarations regarding the estate of Augustin Pereira, who died on 29th December 1942 leaving a will dated 27th March 1939. Dominic sought removal of Joseph as executor and trustee, appointment of a new trustee, and setting aside of certain property sales. Dominic died during the pendency of the suit. The appellant, claiming under a will of Thierry (Dominic's son) and an assignment from Dominic, sought to be impleaded as a plaintiff. The learned Single Judge rejected the application, holding that the suit was a personal action by Dominic which abated upon his death. The Division Bench, however, found that the suit was for administration of the estate of Augustin Pereira, not a personal action. The prayers for removal of executor, appointment of trustee, and setting aside of sales were actions for the benefit of the estate, which do not abate on the death of the plaintiff. The court held that the suit had not abated and that the appellant's impleadment application should be considered on its merits. The appeal was allowed, the impugned order was set aside, and the Chamber Summons was restored for fresh consideration.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Abatement of Suit - Personal Action vs. Estate Administration - Suit for administration of estate does not abate on death of plaintiff - The suit sought removal of executor, appointment of new trustee, and setting aside of sales of estate properties, which are actions for administration of estate, not personal to the plaintiff - Held that the suit is for administration of estate and does not abate (Paras 1-5).

B) Civil Procedure - Impleadment - Order 1 Rule 10 CPC - Application for impleadment as plaintiff - The appellant sought to be impleaded as a plaintiff claiming under a will and assignment - The learned Single Judge rejected the application on the ground that the suit had abated - The Division Bench held that the suit had not abated and remanded the matter for consideration of the impleadment application on merits (Paras 1, 6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the suit filed by Dominic Francis Pereira was a personal action which abated upon his death, and whether the appellant could be impleaded as a plaintiff.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Impugned order dated 20th March 2013 set aside. Chamber Summons No. 39 of 2011 restored to the file of the learned Single Judge for consideration on its own merits in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Suit for administration of estate is not a personal action
  • does not abate on death of plaintiff
  • legal representatives can be substituted
  • impleadment application under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (08) 49

APPEAL NO. 204 OF 2013 IN CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 39 OF 2011 IN SUIT NO. 1240 OF 1989

2014-08-25

S.J. Vazifdar, Revati Mohite Dere

Mr. V. K. Gupta for the Appellant, Mr. Birendra Saraf along with Mr. J. S. Solomon, Ms. Soniya Putta and Mr. Sahay Sali i/by Solomon & Co. for the Respondent No.4, Ms. Aankaksha Thakkar i/by Purnanand & Co. for the Respondent No.8, Mr. Aspi Chinoy, Sr. Counsel along with Mr. V. A. Almeida i/by Bhandary & Bhandary for Respondent No.9

Mohammed Tanweer Ahmad

Dominic Francis Pereira & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against rejection of application for impleadment as plaintiff in a suit for administration of estate.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought to be impleaded as a plaintiff in the suit.

Filing Reason

The appellant claimed under a will and assignment from the original plaintiff and sought to continue the suit for administration of the estate.

Previous Decisions

Learned Single Judge rejected the impleadment application on the ground that the suit was a personal action and had abated upon the death of the original plaintiff.

Issues

Whether the suit filed by Dominic Francis Pereira was a personal action which abated upon his death. Whether the appellant could be impleaded as a plaintiff in the suit.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the suit was for administration of the estate and did not abate on the death of the plaintiff. Respondents argued that the suit was a personal action and had abated.

Ratio Decidendi

A suit for administration of an estate, seeking removal of executor, appointment of trustee, and setting aside of sales of estate properties, is not a personal action and does not abate on the death of the plaintiff. Legal representatives can be substituted, and an application for impleadment under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC should be considered on its merits.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an appeal against the order of a learned Single Judge dated 20th March, 2013 rejecting the appellant's application to be impleaded as a plaintiff in the above suit on the ground that the suit was a personal action by the original plaintiff which had come to an end upon his death and that accordingly, the suit had abated. For the purpose of this appeal, we are not concerned with the rival contentions regarding the extent or mode of inheritance.

Procedural History

Suit No. 1240 of 1989 filed by Dominic Francis Pereira on 15th April 1989. Dominic died during pendency. Appellant filed Chamber Summons No. 39 of 2011 for impleadment. Learned Single Judge rejected the summons on 20th March 2013. Appellant filed Appeal No. 204 of 2013 against that order. Division Bench heard the appeal and allowed it on 25th August 2014.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order 1 Rule 10
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Impleadment in Estate Administration Suit. Suit for Administration of Estate Does Not Abate on Death of Plaintiff, Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Superannuation Age of Private Minority Institute Employees Determined by State Rules, Not Central AICTE/UGC Amendments. Minority Educational Institution’s autonomy upheld; amended AICTE/UGC superannuation regulations not automatically binding unle...