Search Results for "1996 Bombay Blast case"

37 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 37 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitral Tribunal in EPC Contract Dispute — Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation of Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Respondent Did Not Object to Appointment Despite Notice.

The applicant, Vedanta Limited, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an Arbitra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in 2012 Pune Bomb Blast Case Due to Long Pre-Trial Detention of Over 9 Years and Weak Evidence of Involvement. Prolonged detention without trial violates right to speedy trial under Article 21; bail granted under Section 21(4) of NIA Act.

The appellant, Munib Memon, was arrested in connection with the 2012 Pune bomb blast case (German Bakery blast) and had been in judicial custody for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Atrocity Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Improper Investigation. Conviction under SC/ST Act and IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove caste-based insult and arson beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Aba @ Munjaba s/o Rajabhau Giri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-2, Ambajogai, in Special Case No. 3 of 2013 for offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convicts' Emergency Parole Petition for Suppression of Facts and Misleading Statements. Petitioners convicted in 1996 Bombay Blast case sought emergency parole under Maharashtra Prisons Rules but suppressed material facts regarding their parole history and overstays.

The petitioners, Asgar Kadar Sheikh and Mohd Yakub Abdul Majid Nagul, were convicts in the 1996 Bombay Blast case, serving sentences for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Daughter's Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Eviction Decree. Daughter's claim of ownership and right to reside in suit flat rejected as she failed to prove independent title or adverse possession against parents.

The case involves two appeals arising from property disputes between a daughter, Ms. Smita P. Doshi, and her parents, Mr. Pravinchandra H. Doshi and M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of 77 FIRs Against Credit Society Office Bearers to Single MPID Court for Consolidated Trial. Multiplicity of proceedings avoided to ensure fair and expeditious trial under Section 406 CrPC and MPID Act.

The petitioners, office bearers and employees of Bhaichand Hirachand Raisoni Multi State Credit Society, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Contractor's Appeal in Blast Hole Drilling Dispute, Upholds Rate of Rs.115 per Meter for Work Done Without Formal Contract. Court Holds That Absence of Formal Agreement Does Not Preclude Payment on Quantum Meruit Basis for Work Actually Performed and Accepted.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a suit for recovery of Rs.22,76,673/- filed by M/s. Shri Sowmiya Enterprises (plaintiff/contractor) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Outraging Modesty Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Intent. Conviction under Section 354 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Intent to Outrage Modesty Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Madhavrao Suryawanshi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nilanga in Sessions Case No. 10 of 2000 for offences unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for causing burn injuries to victim set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence.

The appellant, Sou Kamal Raju Jadhav, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune for the murder of her sister-in-law, Lata, under Section 30...