Search Results for "section 13(4)"

1524 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1524 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 363, 366(A), 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Maula s/o Babu Kotwal, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.21 of 2015 for offences under Sections ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Dispute for Lack of Jurisdiction. Civil Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain suit challenging acquisition under Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as remedy lies before Reference Court under Section 18.

The appellants, owners of a property in Agonda, Goa, filed a suit seeking withdrawal from acquisition of their plots and compensation of Rs. 1,20,00,0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order in Land Grabbing Case — Civil Court Retains Jurisdiction Over Suit for Declaration and Injunction. Section 20 of Karnataka Land Grabbing Prohibition Act, 2011 Does Not Mandate Transfer of Civil Suit Where No Allegation of Land Grabbing is Made in Plaint.

The petitioner, Joseph Saldhana, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Deputy Commissioner's Revisional Order in Land Conversion Dispute — Petitioner's Right to Change Land Use Upheld. Deputy Commissioner's Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice and Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 136(3) of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964.

The petitioner, Satish Hegde, purchased four acres of land in Sy.No.58 (New Sy.No.141) at Singrahalli Village, Devanahalli Taluk, under a registered s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Easement Right of Way Case — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff failed to prove existence of easement by necessity or prescription over forest land under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Sri B.V. Srikumar, was the unsuccessful plaintiff in a suit for declaration of right of way and permanent injunction against the Chief ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Robbery and Murder Case. Circumstantial evidence and test identification parade found insufficient to convict accused No.2 under Sections 392, 302, 468, 201 read with 34 IPC.

This criminal appeal arose from the acquittal of the second accused by the Principal City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, in Sessions Case No.724...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Murder of Sitting MLA Under Sections 302, 307, 120B IPC, but Accused Challenges Validity of Trial Based on Illegal Charge Sheet and Manipulated Evidence.

The accused No.6 (appellant) appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,...