Search Results for "property identification"

1096 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1096 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Delayed Complaint. Conviction under Sections 376 and 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mansoor @ Ismail, was convicted by the III Additional District and Sessions Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangaluru, in S.C.No.136/2011 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Rajaram s/o Tulshiram Mane, was convicted by the Special Judge, Omerga, in Special Case (NDPS) No. 03 of 2008 for an offence punishable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307, 506(2) r/w 34 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Anil Namdeo Rajguru, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai in Sessions Case No.732 of 1998 for offences punish...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Right of Private Defence and Lack of Common Intention. The court held that the deceased was the aggressor and the appellants acted in self-defence, and the prosecution failed to prove common intention under Section 34 IPC.

The appellants, Nandlal, Parshuram, and Sanjay Baviskar, were convicted by the Sessions Court for the murder of Lakhichand under Section 302 read with...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Deceased Identified Through Tattoo Marks; Last Seen Theory and Motive Established.

The appellant, Uddhav @ Madhukar Ramchandra Jadhav, was convicted by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for the murder of Gaman Dashrath Paw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Rape of 70-Year-Old Woman with Axe. Evidence of Prosecutrix Found Credible; Minor Contradictions Do Not Discredit Prosecution Case Under Sections 376, 324, 506 IPC.

The appellant, Devidas s/o Ragho Koli, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No. 30 of 2010 for offences u...