Search Results for "penal consequences"

2225 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2225 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Repeated Rape and Criminal Intimidation Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 366, 376(2)(n), 323, 504, 506, 341 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Dr. Avinash Manohar Warjurkar, accused no.1 in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2017 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Non-Payment and Failure to Issue Taking Over Certificate. Court holds that disputes regarding interim payment certificates and issuance of TOC are arbitrable under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The applicants, BSI-JDN Joint Venture and others, filed four applications under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Gang Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376D IPC and SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Case Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of three accused persons under Section 376D of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and Section 3(2)(v) r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Kidnapping Case Due to Inconsistent Victim Testimony. Victim's Admission of Voluntary Association and Contradictions in Evidence Lead to Benefit of Doubt Under Section 366 IPC and Section 5(1) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act.

The appellant, Popat Navasu Bendkoli, was convicted by the Special Judge (POCSO), Nashik, for offences under Section 366 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. FIR registered at Ahmednagar quashed as cheque was drawn on Navsari bank and no cause of action arose within Ahmednagar under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, original accused in FIR No. I-382 of 2018 registered at Camp Police Station, Bhingar, Ahmednagar, for an offence under Section 138 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging CESTAT Order Rejecting Recall of Fraud Finding in CENVAT Credit Case. Court holds that CESTAT's finding of mis-statement and fraud was not a reviewable error and that the Tribunal had inherent power to impose costs for abuse of process.

The petitioner, Essel Propack Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing plastic tubes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...