Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3254 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3254 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Addresses Challenge to Arbitral Award Granting Damages in Electricity Supply Contract Dispute. Tribunal's Award of Damages for Installed Objects Questioned on Grounds of Fundamental Breach Limited to Uninstalled Units Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB) and it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Reverses First Appellate Court's Decision and Restores Trial Court's Decree. Court Holds That the First Appellate Court Failed to Properly Reappreciate Evidence and Erred in Reversing the Well-Reasoned Judgment of the Trial Court.

The present regular second appeal was filed by the plaintiffs, Parvathamma and Lokesh H., challenging the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2004 passed ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case, Restores Compensation. Functional Integrality between two companies established, making them jointly liable for unfair labour practices under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

The appeal was filed by workmen against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who had set aside the order of the Industrial...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Wife's Appeal for Return of Stridhan Under Section 27 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Husband Liable for Ornaments and Articles. The court held that the husband is presumed to be in possession of the wife's stridhan and must return it unless he proves otherwise.

The appellant wife, Sangeeta B. Kadam, filed a Family Court Appeal challenging the judgment and order dated 11th June 2001 passed by the Family Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Appellants Entitled to Possession of Suit Property Based on Title and Adverse Possession. Permissive occupation does not create ownership; respondent failed to prove adverse possession or valid title.

The case involves a dispute over possession of a suit plot and house. The original plaintiffs (now appellants) are the sons of Marotrao Dhobale, the o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree in Rent Control Suit — Confirms Findings of Subletting and Non-User of Premises. Landlord's Eviction Suit Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Upheld as Tenants Failed to Prove Bona Fide Use and Consent for Subletting.

The case arises from a landlord-tenant dispute concerning Shop No.2 and rear portion of Shop No.1 in Supariwala Mansion, Parel, Mumbai. The original p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Benami Property Dispute Under Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, 1988. Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Property Was Held for Benefit of Hindu Undivided Family Coparceners Under Section 4(3)(a), Making Suit Barred Under Section 4(1).

The dispute originated from a civil suit filed by Laxmi Prasad, his wife, and two daughters against his two sons and subsequent purchasers, seeking de...