Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Section 34(1)"

1049 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1049 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Additional FSI Approval as Abuse of Process. Court finds lack of bonafides and imposes costs of Rs. 5,00,000 for misuse of public interest litigation jurisdiction.

27 Sep 2022

The Bombay High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Sarthi Seva Sangh and another petitioner, challenging the approval of an a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Plaint Amendment in Permanent Injunction Suit — Amendment Sought After Trial Commenced Held Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC. The court upheld the trial court's order rejecting the amendment application filed after the commencement of trial, as the plaintiff failed to show due diligence and the amendment was sought after a lapse of nearly 5 years.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, who was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 1102 of 2017 before the II Additional Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural, filed a writ petition under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Police Patil Candidate Challenging Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Appointment Based on Legal Heir Preference. Preference Rule Valid as Tilting Factor Among Equally Qualified Candidates Under Government Gazette Notification.

19 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Dilip Punjaji Kharat, applied for the post of Police Patil pursuant to an advertisement. He claimed entitlement to six additional mark...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Gratuity Payment Despite Departmental Enquiry — Forfeiture of Gratuity Requires Specific Finding of Quantified Loss. Employer Cannot Forfeit Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Without Specific Charge and Finding of Quantified Loss.

29 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Vinod Vinayak Jinturkar, a former employee of the Maharashtra Small Scale Industries Development Corporation (respondent no.2), filed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conditional Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Magnetite Powder Price. The court held that triable issues existed but the defendant's defence was not wholly bona fide, warranting security under Order 37 Rule 3(5) CPC.

5 Jan 2011

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from a summary suit for recovery of Rs. 38,89,674.14 filed by the plaintiff (M/s. Parijat Enterprises...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Favor of Client Against Trading Member for Unauthorized Trades. Award of Rs.6,59,634.54 with interest upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

19 Nov 2012

The petitioner, Angel Broking Private Limited, a trading member, challenged an arbitral award dated 29 August 2009 passed by a sole arbitrator appoint...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Impleadment of Co-owners in Suit for Possession. Order 1 Rule 10 CPC Allows Addition of Parties with Direct Interest in Subject Matter to Avoid Multiplicity of Suits.

12 Dec 2005

The petitioners, Sitaram Deorao Pawar and Totaram Deorao Pawar, filed two separate writ petitions challenging an order dated 6/11/2003 passed by the J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Orders Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Drastic Alternatives — Detenues Already in Judicial Custody at Time of Order. Preventive detention order invalid as detaining authority did not consider possibility of bail or less drastic measures despite detenues being in judicial custody.

7 Jul 2006

The Bombay High Court disposed of two criminal writ petitions challenging detention orders dated 30th June 2005 passed under Section 3(1) of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Passing Off Action Over Identical Trademark 'LEAKGUARD' — Prior User and Reputation Established by Plaintiff Since 1999. The Court held that the Plaintiffs had made out a strong prima facie case of prior user and reputation, and the balance of convenience was in their favor, warranting an interim injunction.

9 Sep 2015

The Plaintiffs, Pidilite Industries Limited and Hardcastle & Waud Manufacturing Co. Ltd., filed a suit for passing off against the Defendants, Vilas N...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Tempo Accident Victim — Owner Held Liable Despite Insurance Exclusion. Coolie Injured in Rash Driving Awarded Rs. 3,00,000/- Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

29 Sep 2020

The appellant, Munikrishna Murthy, was a coolie traveling in a tempo bearing registration No.KA-04/B-622 owned by respondent No.1 (Abraham) on 2.3.200...

97 98 99 100 101

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)