Search Results for "Magistrate's permission"

1851 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1851 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Allowing Re-examination During Cross-examination in NDPS Case — Re-examination Permissible Only After Cross-examination Under Section 137 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872

The applicant, accused in NDPS Special Case No.51 of 2011 pending before the Special Judge for NDPS, Greater Mumbai, challenged an order dated 19 June...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Abetment to Suicide Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Sexual Assault Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by three appellants against their conviction by the District Judge-7 & Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Executing Court's Order in Partition Execution — No Jurisdictional Error Found. Executing Court Cannot Go Behind Decree and Objections Under Order 21 Rule 90 CPC Must Be Raised Before Sale Confirmation.

The case arises from a partition suit (Partition Suit No.945 of 1968) filed by the heirs of Bachhusingh, who died intestate on 24-11-1964, concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Lack of Jurisdiction in Bank Guarantee Dispute — Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract Confers Jurisdiction on Chennai Courts. Plaintiff L&T's Suit Challenging Invocation of Performance Bank Guarantee Dismissed as Bombay High Court Has No Territorial Jurisdiction.

The plaintiff, Larsen & Toubro Limited (L&T), filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking a declaration that the invocation of a Performance Bank Gu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Seeking Directions to Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals for Compliance with Procedural Rules. Court Holds That Insistence on Personal Appearance of Claimants at Filing Is Not Mandatory Under Rule 254(2) of Maharashtra Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Anil Prabhakar Tadkalkar, a practicing advocate, raising several issues concerning the disposal of claim ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Long Incarceration. Petitioners/Accused Nos.5 and 6 Granted Regular Bail Under Section 439 CrPC for Offences Under Sections 143, 147, 148, 307 r/w 149 IPC.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided by Justice K. Somashekar, disposed of two connected criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal Order of APMC Chairman for Non-Compliance with Section 17 of Maharashtra APMC Act — Resolution Not Passed by Requisite Majority. The court held that the requirement of a resolution by at least 10 members is mandatory and cannot be dispensed with.

The petitioner, Sharad Bapuraoji Deshmukh, was an elected Director and Chairman of the Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Wardha. The District Dep...