Search Results for "lawfully held"

1380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Injunction in Property Dispute Over Access and Possession of Suit Plot. Court finds no prima facie case for exclusive possession or title in favour of plaintiff society of flat purchasers.

The plaintiffs, a proposed co-operative society of flat purchasers in Girnar Tower, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendants, incl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Decree Holder's Appeal in Execution Proceedings — Transfer of Attached Property Void Under Section 64 CPC. Sale of Property by Judgment Debtor After Attachment Order Cannot Defeat Decree Holder's Right to Execute Decree.

The case arises from a First Appeal filed by Mrs. Meera Unnikrishnan, the decree holder, against the dismissal of her execution application by the Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Termination of Agricultural Tenancy for Bona Fide Personal Cultivation. Landlord's Successor in Interest Entitled to Resume Possession Under Section 31 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the judgment and order dated 30 December 1988 of the Tenancy Awal Karkun, Shirala, and the s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bidder Qualification in Tender Process — Debarment by One State Does Not Automatically Disqualify in Another State's Tender Without Specific Clause in Tender Document.

The Petitioner, Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Respondent Nos....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Challenge to Arbitral Award in Partnership Dispute — Upholds Award of Rs. 7.39 Crore with Interest. Limitation plea rejected as claim was within time; quantification not perverse.

The judgment concerns a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...