Search Results for "Reply Statement"

7112 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7112 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Foreclosure of Contracts for Space Under Flyovers by MSRDC. Contractual Termination Upheld Due to Breach of Terms and Public Interest.

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by contractors challenging the foreclosure of contracts by the Maharashtra State Road Development ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Appeal Against Demolition Order in MMC Act Case — Failure to Issue Notice to Owner and Lack of Personal Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Tenant in Possession Since Prior to 1987 Entitled to Hearing Before Demolition Under Section 351 of MMC Act.

The appellant, a tenant in possession of premises since prior to 1987, challenged a show cause notice under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corpor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals of Tenants Against MHADA in Slum Rehabilitation Disputes — Held That Tenants in Possession Before Cut-Off Date Are Entitled to Rehabilitation Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement, Clearance and Redevelopment) Act, 1971.

The judgment involves multiple appeals filed by tenants against the Maharashtra Housing Area Development Authority (MHADA) concerning slum rehabilitat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Rescind Consent Decree and Allows Substitution of Legal Heirs in Recovery Suit. Consent Terms Are Binding Contract; Legal Representatives Can Be Substituted Under Order 22 CPC for Execution of Decree.

The plaintiffs filed a suit (Suit No.2011 of 2002) against the defendants for recovery of Rs.3,30,00,000 with interest. On 3rd October 2006, the parti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay. Delay of 10 Months Between Release on Bail and Detention Order Held to Snap Live Link, Vitiating Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA, 1974.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Shyam Dharmadas Amlani, challenged the detention order dated 15th October 2005 passed by the State Government under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging MIDC Plot Allotments — No Arbitrariness Found in Allotment Process. Petitioner's claim for allotment based on alleged earmarking fails as no legal right established.

The petitioner, Vikrant Industries, a sole proprietorship, filed a writ petition under Articles 226, 14, and 19 of the Constitution of India challengi...