Search Results for "Permanent Establishment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Permanent Establishment"

1094 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1094 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Order Permitting Withdrawal of Suit with Liberty to File Fresh Suit Under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC. Defects in Plaint Including Misjoinder, Non-valuation, and Improper Reliefs Held Not Formal Defects.

23 Dec 2005

The case involves a civil revision application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, filed by Rajaram s/o Jairam Raut (the defendant...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition Against Employer in Contract Labour Abolition Case. Termination of Contract Workers After Expiry of Contract Period Does Not Violate Interim Order as Order Only Maintained Status Quo During Pendency of Writ Petition.

18 Feb 2005

The petitioner, General Employees Association, a registered trade union under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, representing contract labourers employed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Promotion to Sanitary Supervisor Post in Defence Establishment. Petitioner entitled to promotion from date of vacancy with consequential benefits as post existed and was not abolished.

10 Feb 2005

The petitioner, M. Venugopalan, was employed as a Sanitary Inspector under the Ministry of Defence and was promoted to that post on 25.5.1978. He clai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Claim of Daily Wager Converted to Temporary Employee — Half of Pre-Regularization Service Counted as Qualifying Service Under Office Memorandum Dated 1st May, 1987. The court held that the petitioner, who served as a daily wager for 18 years and then as a temporary employee for 15 years, is entitled to pension with half of the daily wage period counted as qualifying service, as he was deemed to have opted for the pension scheme under the 4th Central Pay Commission recommendations.

15 Jul 2005

The petitioner, Raman Ganda, was appointed as a daily wager in the Water Supply Department of the Union Territory of Daman and Diu in 1969. He worked ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Alleging Unfair Labour Practice in Promotion of Workmen. Industrial Court's finding that promotions were based on merit and seniority as per settlement upheld.

1 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Dockyard Labour Union, a trade union registered under the Trade Unions Act, 1926, filed a complaint before the Industrial Court at Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Video Game Parlour Licence Despite Parking Concerns, Emphasizes Reasonable Exercise of Police Powers Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Commissioner's Refusal Based on Mere Apprehension Without Specific Evidence Held Arbitrary.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Jagdish N. Shetty, sole proprietor of M/s. Om Sai Video Game Parlour, applied for a licence under the Bombay Police Act, 1951 to opera...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits by Counting Prior Service with Board Under Rule 46(2) of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Resignation to Take Up Another Appointment with Permission Does Not Forfeit Past Service

10 Dec 2013

The Petitioner, Smt. Nagaveni R., filed a writ petition seeking pension and other retiral benefits by counting her service from 25.2.1975 to 5.11.1984...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Order Rejecting Plaint in Property Suit — Limitation Period for Suit Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 Is Six Months from Date of Dispossession, Not from Date of Knowledge. Plaint cannot be rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC based on disputed facts regarding possession.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Ganpat Shankar Chougule, filed a suit in the Bombay City Civil Court seeking possession of a property under Section 6 of the Specific R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Property Dispute Over Succession Certificate — Held That Succession Certificate Is Not Necessary for Claiming Title by Adverse Possession or Will. The court clarified that a succession certificate under the Indian Succession Act, 1925 is not a prerequisite for filing a suit for declaration of title based on a Will or adverse possession, and that the Civil Court has jurisdiction to decide such matters.

14 Nov 2025

The case involves two cross civil revision applications arising from a property dispute between Maharukh Mediomah Patel (applicant in CRA/64/2021) and...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Election of President in Gramdan Village Under Maharashtra Gramdan Act, 1964 — Petitioner Disqualified for Not Filing Declaration Under Section 5(1). Court holds that the appeal was maintainable but the Petitioner's nomination was rightly rejected due to non-compliance with the proviso to Section 11.

14 Feb 2014

The Petitioner, Bharat Moru Mahadik, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging two orders: (1) the ord...

96 97 98 99 100

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)