Search Results for "third judge reference"

5662 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5662 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Land Acquired by BDA, Filed by Agreement Holder. Agreement Executed After Preliminary Notification Held Void; Suppression of Civil Suit and Lack of Title Preclude Compensation.

The petitioner, claiming to be an agreement holder in respect of certain lands notified for acquisition by the Bangalore Development Authority for the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Challenging Election of Directors to Cooperative Bank Board. Minister's Order Under Section 154 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 Upheld as Valid and Election Process Not Vitiated by Irregularities.

The case involves a batch of Letters Patent Appeals filed by individuals challenging the election of directors to the Yavatmal District Central Cooper...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Disposes of Appeals Challenging Apportionment of Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act. Reference Court Had Awarded Entire Compensation to One Party Without Framing Issues or Properly Evaluating Evidence Under Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard three first appeals against the judgment of the Reference Court dated 15.07.2010, which had awarded the entire c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Land Acquisition for CIDCO Project, Upholds Validity of Acquisition Under 2013 Act. Court holds that acquisition under the 1894 Act had lapsed but was validly revived under the 2013 Act, and that the Court Receiver was not in possession at the time of taking over.

The case involves three writ petitions concerning the acquisition of land bearing survey no. 59/8 at Village Asudgaon, Taluka Panvel, District Raigad,...