Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "possession and enjoyment"

1346 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1346 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Vacation of Interim Injunction in Tenancy Dispute. Possession Delivered Under Tenancy Act in 1968 Held to Confer Prima Facie Right, Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside.

11 Jan 2018

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for declaration of ownership and possession and for perpetual injunction in respect of agricultural...

High Court

High Court of Madras reviewed a revision petition challenging the trial court's dismissal of applications to condone delay and recall an order permitting withdrawal of suit under Article 227, Constitution of India. The core issue concerned whether an application under Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to recall a withdrawal order was governed by Section 5 or Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963, and whether a counter claim survives withdrawal.

7 Aug 2026

The matter arose from O.S.No.180 of 2019 filed by the revision petitioner as plaintiff seeking declaration and permanent injunction over suit property...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application Under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC for Alleged Violation of Injunction Order. Court holds that mere filing of a suit for permanent injunction does not automatically establish willful disobedience of an interim order without proof of specific notice and deliberate defiance.

23 Feb 2021

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in a suit for permanent injunction, filed an application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC alleging that the responden...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Franchisee in EuroKids Trademark Dispute — Franchise Agreement Terminated Due to Non-Payment of Royalty and Breach of Terms. Court Restrains Respondent from Using Petitioner's Trademarks and Operating as Franchisee Pending Arbitration.

1 Jul 2015

The petitioner, EuroKids International Private Limited, filed an arbitration petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Appointment of Court Commissioner in Perpetual Injunction Suit — Review Rejected as Not Maintainable. The court held that appointment of a Court Commissioner under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC is a procedural order not amenable to review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC, and that the trial court did not exceed its jurisdiction in appointing a commissioner to ascertain the identity and extent of the suit property.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioners, defendants in Regular Civil Suit No.98 of 2008, challenged two orders passed by the 5th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Pune: (1)...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Trial Court's Decree for 5/7th Share. Appellant's claim of adverse possession and independent title rejected as she failed to prove exclusive possession and the suit property was ancestral joint family property.

9 Feb 2017

The Regular First Appeal No.4169 of 2012 was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Challenging Order Under Section 133 Cr.P.C. for Removal of Obstruction to Public Pathway. Court upholds concurrent findings that the disputed pathway is a public road and petitioners failed to prove exclusive ownership.

12 Sep 2014

The case arises from a petition under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 filed by the first respondent (Balachanda M. Thammaiah) agai...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Claiming Easementary Rights Over 20ft Wide Road — Pleadings Must Specifically Allege 20-Year User for Prescription Under Section 15 of Indian Easements Act, 1882. Easement of Necessity Requires Proof of Absolute Necessity and Common Origin, Which Was Not Established.

10 Apr 2024

The dispute pertains to easementary rights over a 20ft wide road situated on land Survey No.57 Hissa No.13A/1 owned by the respondents (Ramani's). The...

High Court

Bombay High Court Issues Rule in PIL Challenging Denial of Water Supply to Illegal Slums in Mumbai. The petition challenges Government Circular dated 4th March 1996 directing no water supply to unauthorized constructions, raising issues of right to water and slum protection under Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

15 Dec 2014

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by Pani Haq Samiti and others against the Brihan Mumbai Municipal Corporati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court Judgment in Land Title Dispute Due to Jurisdictional Error and Procedural Defects. High Court Exceeded Authority Under Section 100 CPC by Re-appreciating Evidence Without Framing Substantial Question of Law, and Specific Performance Decree Was Invalid for Non-Impleadment of Necessary Parties.

17 Jan 2022

The dispute involved a long-standing conflict over land measuring 0.08 cents, part of a larger 50-acre parcel, with origins dating back to the 1960s. ...

95 96 97 98 99

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)