Search Results for "additional cost"

4712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Composite Show Cause Notice Issued Under Section 74 of CGST Act for Multiple Tax Periods

The petitioner, a partnership firm engaged in real estate development and registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, filed a writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Evacuee Property Dispute, Upholding Sale of Specified Area Under Displaced Persons Act. Property Transfer Limited to Area in Sale Certificate and Conveyance Deed, with Additional Areas Requiring Payment as per Chief Settlement Commissioner's Orders Under Section 24(1).

The appeal before the Supreme Court arose from a property dispute concerning 'Spring Field', an evacuee property in Shimla. The appellants, legal heir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses BBMP Appeal Against Single Judge Order Directing Regularisation of Unauthorised Construction Under Section 321 of KMC Act. Contempt Petition Closed as Compliance Achieved During Pendency of Appeal.

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Bruhath Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) against an order dated 29.05.2024 passed by a learned Single J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Dispute over Transferable Development Rights and Incentive Benefits under Development Control Regulations.

The case involves Bholenath Developers Ltd. challenging the denial of additional Transferable Development Rights (TDR) benefits by the Municipal Corpo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Workmen's Bonus Award by Limiting Depreciation Deduction in Surplus Calculation. Depreciation Admissible Under Income-tax Act Cannot Be Fully Claimed as Prior Charge; Abnormal Additions Like Initial and Additional Depreciation Not Fair to Workmen.

The case arose from an industrial dispute between Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. and their workmen concerning payment of bonus for the year 1950–51. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Money Recovery Suit — Photostat Copy Compared with Original is Admissible as Secondary Evidence Under Section 63 of Evidence Act, 1872. Section 11 of Karnataka Money Lenders Act, 1961 Does Not Mandate Production of Licence to Maintain Suit.

The appellant, Shri M. Ratnavarma Padival, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgm...