Search Results for "Safeguard Duty"

1229 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1229 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates First Appeal Against Dismissal of Suit for Specific Performance. Cross Objection Filed by Defendants Challenges Direction to Repay with Interest.

The matter arose from a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Gold Touch Real Estate Private Limited, a real estate developer, against six respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Division Bench Examines if Order Directing Police Investigation is Interlocutory and if Revision Lies Under Section 397 or 401 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, was seized of several criminal writ petitions and applications challenging orders passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.

The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Revision Against Order Under Section 156(3) CrPC. Court examines whether an order directing police investigation under Section 156(3) is interlocutory and whether a revision petition under Section 397 or 401 CrPC lies against such order.

A batch of criminal writ petitions and applications came before the Division Bench of the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad, raising a common question o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Closure Permission for Textile Mills Under Section 25-O of Industrial Disputes Act. The Court Stresses Need for Genuine and Adequate Grounds and Balances Industrial Needs with Worker Welfare, While Exercising Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The dispute arose from the closure of two textile establishments, the Crown Mills Division and Process House Unit of Hindustan Spinning and Weaving Mi...