Search Results for "Central Services"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Central Services"

4685 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4685 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Impleadment Applications by IPS Officers in Central Armed Police Forces Recruitment Rules Case. Impleadment Denied as Applicants Lacked Direct Legal Interest and Were Not Necessary Parties Under Order I Rule 10 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

28 Jun 2021

The Supreme Court dealt with interlocutory applications filed by Indian Police Service officers seeking impleadment in special leave petitions arising...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds State in Seniority Dispute, Clarifies 'Select List' under IPS Seniority Rules. Second proviso to Rule 3(3)(b) of Indian Police Service (Regulation of Seniority) Rules, 1954 limits officiation period to after inclusion in Select List for substantive appointment; pre-regulation 'fit for trial' lists not valid Select Lists.

11 Apr 1969

The dispute concerned the determination of seniority and year of allotment of a member of the Indian Police Service (IPS) initially appointed as Deput...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Deputation Allowance Dispute for NDRF Personnel. The Court held that personnel of Central Para Military Forces sent to NDRF were not on deputation and are entitled to deputation allowance only from 14.01.2013, not from the date of joining.

1 Jan 2020

The case involves a dispute over deputation allowance for personnel of the Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) who were sent to the National Disa...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Service Tax on Transmission of Electricity as Premature. Challenge to Show Cause Notice Under Section 66E(e) of Finance Act, 1994 Rejected Without Examining Merits Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy.

22 Oct 2018

The petitioner, Karnataka Power Transmission Corporation Limited (KPTCL), filed a writ petition on 07.12.2016 challenging a Show Cause Notice dated 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petitions Challenging CAT Directions on Promotion to General Manager (Open Line) — Employer's Delay and Contradictory Stand Negate Requirement of DRM Experience. Court Holds That Under Indian Railway Establishment Rules, 1986, Working as Divisional Railway Manager Is Not a Mandatory Eligibility Condition, and Employer Cannot Set Up Its Own Wrong to Deny Consideration for Promotion.

4 Sep 2017

The dispute arose from the denial of promotion to the post of General Manager (Open Line) to an officer of the Indian Railways. The officer had faced ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers Criminal Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 IPC. The Court Framed Issues on Trial Validity Due to Accused’s Mental Condition and Adequacy of Prosecution Evidence Including Hostile Witnesses.

21 Dec 2020

The criminal appeal arose from the judgment and order of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge at Raichur in S.C. No.1/2015 convicting the acc...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Issues Interim Directions in Writ Petition for Implementation of Compensation Scheme for Hit and Run Motor Accident Victims. The court directed the Standing Committee to review the Scheme's implementation and police to inform victims, addressing low claim uptake and lack of awareness under Section 161 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

12 Jan 2024

The Supreme Court, in a writ petition, addressed concerns regarding the ineffective implementation of the Compensation of Victims of Hit and Run Motor...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Department's Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Limitation Period Under Section 11B Is Mandatory and Unjust Enrichment Applies to Pre-deposit Refunds. The court held that the one-year limitation for refund claims cannot be extended and the claimant must prove no passing of duty burden.

8 Mar 2024

The case involves two connected matters: an appeal by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Thane Rural, against an order of the Customs, Excise ...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.5186 OF 2001

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Caste Scrutiny Committee Orders — Orders Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Petitioners' Caste Certificates Directed to Be Verified Afresh by Scrutiny Committee After Providing Opportunity of Hearing.

8 Jul 2014

The petitioners, employees of the Central Ground Water Board, held caste certificates issued by competent authorities. The Scheduled Tribe Caste Certi...

95 96 97 98 99

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)