Search Results for "Article 173"

1068 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1068 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302 and 120-B IPC and Arms Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove conspiracy and identity of assailants beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of V.G. Patil, a college lecturer and political activist, on 21 September 2005. The prosecution alleged that the decea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MLA's Petition Alleging Discriminatory Allocation of Slum Development Funds. Court holds that allocation of funds under Maharashtra Local Development Fund is an executive policy decision not subject to judicial review unless arbitrary or mala fide.

The petitioner, Ravindra Dattaram Waikar, a Member of Legislative Assembly (MLA) from Jogeshwari (E) constituency, filed a writ petition alleging disc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Customs Duty Demand Case Due to Inordinate Delay — 9-Year Delay in Adjudication Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Is Oppressive Under Customs Act, 1962.

The petitioner, Eastern Agencies Aromatics (P) Ltd., a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Caus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Against Retired Government Officer in Irrigation Scam Due to Lack of Sanction for Prosecution. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is mandatory and refusal by competent authority bars prosecution.

The petitioner, Chandan Tulsiram Jibhakate, a retired Senior Divisional Account Officer, was implicated in five FIRs (Crime Nos. 540/2017, 542/2017, 6...