Search Results for "tenancy right"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "tenancy right"

1821 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1821 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Presumption Under Section 55 Not Rebutted. Landlord Failed to Produce Written Agreement or Rebut Presumption of Tenancy, Leading to Setting Aside of Eviction Order.

10 Oct 2006

The petitioner, Prakash Ghevarchand Kothari, challenged the eviction order passed by the competent authority under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved Due to Lack of Independent Witnesses and Discrepancies in Evidence. Court upholds trial court's finding that the plaintiff failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform the contract under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

9 Jul 2014

The case involves a first appeal filed by the original plaintiff, Naziruddin Khan (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), against the dismis...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Plaint in Eviction Suit. Amendment to Clarify Property Description Allowed Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as No Prejudice Caused to Tenant.

10 Oct 2014

The petitioner, M/s K.T. Kubal & Company, was a tenant in a building owned by the respondent, Mujibur Rehman Haji Israr Alam Siddiqui. The respondent ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Orders on Grounds of Default, Change of User, and Bonafide Requirement Under Bombay Rent Act. Court upholds concurrent findings that tenant failed to prove payment of rent, changed user from residential to commercial, and landlord's requirement was reasonable and bonafide.

8 Sep 2015

The case pertains to a dispute between the landlord, Mohan J. Jhangiani (since deceased, represented by his legal heirs), and the tenant, Viratna Vidy...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff's claim for possession of agricultural land failed as the suit was held to be not maintainable in civil court due to bar under Section 85 of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

30 Nov -0001

The appellant, Siddhivinayak Audyogik Vasahat Maryadit, a society, filed two second appeals against the judgment and decree passed by the District Jud...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Tenant's Revision in Rent Control Eviction Case — Building Constructed After 2001 Exempt from Karnataka Rent Act, 1999. Landlord's Suit for Ejectment Maintainable Under Small Causes Court Act as Section 2(3)(g) Exemption Applies to Premises Constructed After Commencement of the Act.

29 Nov 2013

The case involves a civil revision petition filed by the tenant, K.A. Hameed, challenging the order dated 05.09.2013 passed by the II Additional Small...

High Court

Bombay High Court Determines True Interpretation of Common Plots Conveyance in Favor of Co-owner Societies. The expression 'tenants in common' in the conveyance indicates absolute co-ownership, not a lease, and MHADA retains no title.

18 Jun 2024

The plaintiff, Vithalnagar Society Ltd, a co-operative housing society, filed an Originating Summons seeking determination of the true interpretation ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Writ Petitions Challenging Mandatory Pre-Deposit under Section 35F of Central Excise Act, 1944. The court examined whether the mandatory deposit requirement violated Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 265 of the Constitution of India.

7 Oct 2015

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions filed by several assessees, including Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., Prestige Garde...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Forum for Trial in SEBI Act Cases — Retrospective Application of 2002 and 2014 Amendments Disputed. Court Considers Whether Change from Magistrate to Sessions Court and Subsequent Special Courts Affects Pre‑2002 Offences Still Pending.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of appeals and petitions before the Supreme Court concerned the proper forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange Board ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Regulatory Appeal on Trial Forum under Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992. Procedural Amendment to Section 26 by the 2002 Amendment Act Held Retrospective, and All Pending Trials for Pre-2002 Offences Must Proceed Before Special Court as per the 2014 Amendment.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court addressed a batch of appeals and writ petitions concerning the correct forum for trial of offences under the Securities and Exchange...

94 95 96 97 98

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)