Search Results for "tax refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "tax refund"

1207 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1207 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased was not wearing helmet and had no valid driving license, contributing to accident; insurer's liability limited to 50% under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

1 Aug 2022

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of Rohidas Dahiphale, who died in a collision between his motorcycle and a truck....

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Anti-Dumping Duty Recommendation on Flexible Slabstock Polyol from Saudi Arabia and UAE — Violation of Principles of Natural Justice and Failure to Consider Relevant Material. The Designated Authority's final findings dated 01.09.2020 were set aside for non-consideration of the petitioners' submissions and reliance on unsubstantiated data, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

6 Jan 2021

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the final findings dated 01.09.2020 of the D...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Directors' Challenge to Pre-deposit Order in Cenvat Credit Penalty Case — Rule 13(1) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2002 Does Not Permit Personal Penalty on Directors. The court set aside the CESTAT order directing pre-deposit of 25% penalty by directors, holding that Rule 13(1) only contemplates penalty on the person availing credit.

19 Jan 2010

The petitioners, Mr. Ashokkumar H. Fulwadhya and Mr. Daulatkumar H. Fulwadhya, directors of M/s. Harisons Steel Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 4...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal of Commissioner of Central Excise in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Erred in Holding No Provision for Penalty Under Central Excise Act or Rules. Rule 209 of Central Excise Rules, 1944 Provides for Penalty for Offences Relating to Excisable Goods.

14 Sep 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise filed an appeal against the order dated 31st March 2005 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tri...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Limitation Bar Upheld. Show Cause Notice Issued After Six Years Held Time-Barred as Assessee Did Not Suppress Facts.

22 Jun 2011

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Goa, filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, against the order of the Customs, Excise a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus to Issue Exemption Notification Under Section 25 of Customs Act, 1962 — No Fundamental Right to Exemption from Customs Duty. Budget Proposal Does Not Have Force of Law Until Enacted; Power Under Section 25 is Permissive, Not Mandatory.

2 Sep 2011

The petitioner, Amin Merchant, imported eight consignments of goods classified under Tariff Heading 2208.10 of the Customs Tariff during financial yea...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale of Immovable Property — Purchaser Failed to Demonstrate Willingness to Complete Transaction. Readiness without willingness is insufficient for specific performance under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, as the plaintiff insisted on adjustment of loans without calling upon defendant to pay its share.

8 Apr 2019

The suit was filed by G Ram Construction Company (plaintiff) against Chowgule & Company (Hind) Pvt Ltd (defendant) for specific performance of an agre...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal by Union Bank of India in Banking Ombudsman Award Enforcement Case. Court Upholds Single Judge Order Directing Reconsideration of One-Time Settlement Proposal, Holding Banking Ombudsman Award Binding Under Banking Ombudsman Scheme, 2006 and Section 35A Banking Regulation Act, 1949.

16 Oct 2025

The case involves a dispute between Union Bank of India (appellant) and M/s NHDPL South Private Limited (respondent/borrower) regarding the bank's ref...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Recovery of Security Deposit in Leave and Licence Agreement Dispute. Option to Purchase Not Exercised Does Not Convert Licence into Sale.

27 Oct 2005

The plaintiff, Polaroid India P.Ltd, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for recovery of Rs.1,60,00,000/- being ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Video Game Parlour Licence Despite Parking Concerns, Emphasizes Reasonable Exercise of Police Powers Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. Commissioner's Refusal Based on Mere Apprehension Without Specific Evidence Held Arbitrary.

28 Oct 2013

The petitioner, Jagdish N. Shetty, sole proprietor of M/s. Om Sai Video Game Parlour, applied for a licence under the Bombay Police Act, 1951 to opera...

94 95 96 97 98

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)