NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 443 OF 2012
27 Jun 2013The matter arises out of Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay High Court, filed by Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd. against Jignesh Shah, Aruna Sh...
Search Results for "reasonable time"
15362 result(s) found
Found 15362 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Addresses Interim Applications in Redevelopment Contract Dispute Between Developer and Partner. The Court Examines Injunctions Against Termination and Alienation of Property Under the Specific Relief Act.
27 Jun 2013The plaintiff, Shapoorji Pallonji & Company Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1913, filed Suit No. 1512 of 2009 before the Bombay ...
- 30
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Lease Rent Revision Based on Ready Reckoner Rates for Housing Societies in Bandra. Court holds that linkage of lease rent to land value is not per se prohibited and the Government Resolutions of 2006, 2012, and 2018 are constitutionally valid.
10 Jul 2024The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, upheld the constitutional validity of Government Resolutions (GRs) dated 29th May 2006, 12th Dece...
- 957
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bye-Election to Fill Casual Vacancy in Katol Assembly Constituency. Section 151A of Representation of the People Act, 1951 Mandates Filling Casual Vacancy Within Six Months, and the Election Schedule Complies with the Statutory Time Limit.
12 Apr 2019The petitioner, Sandeep Yashwantrao Sarode, Chairman of Panchayat Samiti, Katol, and Director of Agriculture Produce Market Committee, Katol, filed a ...
- 147
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Convicted Offender in Murder Case Due to Unsoundness of Mind Under Section 84 IPC. Appellant's act of killing brother and injuring another held to be act of person incapable of knowing nature of act by reason of unsoundness of mind.
17 Dec 2021The appellant, Rajendra Adakuji Choudhary, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case No.84/2014 for offenses under S...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Hotel Murder and Rape Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Under Sections 302, 376, 201 IPC After Finding Chain of Circumstances Including Absconding and DNA Match.
16 Dec 2016The appeal arose from the conviction of Vishal @ Shivaji Mahadeo Kamble by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No.66 of 20...
- 18
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Specific Performance Appeal in Land Sale Dispute — Agreement to Sell Valid Despite Non-Registration and Subsequent Alienation. The court held that the appellants paid full consideration, took possession, and were ready and willing; subsequent sale deeds executed in violation of injunction are void.
12 Nov 2024The dispute pertains to six suits for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell dated 30.08.1990 executed by Sushila Devi in favour of the appellan...
- 1653
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Remand Order in Property Dispute - Concurrent Findings on Limitation Upheld. High Court Erred in Remanding Matter for Fresh Trial Instead of Deciding Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.
9 Apr 2025The appeal arose from a property dispute involving a joint Hindu family. The litigation originated from a 1965 suit (O.S.No.851 of 1965) filed by Sund...
- 275
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Part on Operational Creditor Status but Upholds Dismissal on Limitation in Insolvency Case. The court held that a purchaser does not qualify as an operational creditor under Section 5(20) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the application under Section 9 was barred by limitation due to debt arising from 2013 transactions.
4 Feb 2022The appeal arose from a dispute under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, involving the appellant, Consolidated Construction Consortium Limited,...
- 185
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Pre-emption Case Under West Bengal Land Reforms Act — Full Consideration Must Be Deposited at Time of Filing Application. The Court held that the pre-emptor must deposit the entire consideration as per the sale deed, not a self-assessed amount, and failure to do so renders the application invalid.
17 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the right of pre-emption under the West Bengal Land Reforms Act, 1955. The appellants purchased a plot of land from t...
- 594
