Search Results for "court witnesses"

12409 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 12409 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Extortion Case Due to Long Incarceration and Snail-Paced Trial. Delay in FIR and Lack of Evidence Weaken Prosecution Case Under Sections 364-A, 384, 385, 386, 387 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Mohammad Khalid Mukhtar Ahmed Shaikh, was accused No.1 in C.R. No.312 of 2020 registered with Bhiwandi City Police Station for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Additional Charge Under Section 467 IPC in CBI Case — No Prima Facie Evidence of Forgery. Court held that mere fabrication of accounts without evidence of creating false document with intent to cause damage does not attract Section 467 IPC.

The petitioners, Mr. Nikhil Girish Patt, Mr. Ilesh Shah, and Mr. Sooraj Kumar Tayade, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing Petition in SFIO Case — Remand Orders Valid Despite Cognizance Issue. Court holds that remand orders under Section 167 Cr.P.C. are independent of cognizance and not subject to challenge under Section 482 Cr.P.C. after filing of complaint.

The applicant, Hari Sankaran, was arrested by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office (SFIO) on 1 April 2019 for an offence punishable under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A IPC Due to Lack of Evidence and Procedural Lapses -- Conviction Overturned and Acquittal Restored

The appellant was convicted by the first appellate court under Sections 279, 337, 338, and 304A of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for rash and negligen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Rape and Murder of Two-Year-Old Child. The court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC, Section 376A IPC, and Section 6 of POCSO Act, finding the crime to be in the 'rarest of rare' category.

The case involves the confirmation of a death sentence and an appeal against conviction for the rape and murder of a two-year-old child. The incident ...