Search Results for "ownership evidence"

3247 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3247 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Adjudicates Regular Second Appeals Involving Dispute Over Joint Family Property, Adoption, and Will. The LRs of Second Wife Challenge Decrees Dismissing Her Claim of Sole Ownership and Upholding Adoption of Shettygowda under Hindu Law.

The judgment concerns three Regular Second Appeals (RSA) filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from decrees in three o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership in Favor of Daughter. Claim of adverse possession by brother against sister fails as co-owner must prove ouster or denial of title.

The dispute pertains to agricultural lands and a house situated at Village Dhokawade, Taluka Alibaug, District Raigad, originally owned by Narayan Hir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Standing Order 1/89 Regarding Representative Sampling of Opium Poppy Plants Renders Prosecution Case Doubtful.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 3rd May 2000 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Satara in Sessions Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. The appellant failed to prove title and possession, and no substantial question of law was raised.

The case involves a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated 10.11.2006 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeal by Convict Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 394 IPC for Murder and Robbery. The Court Examines the Admissibility of Test Identification Evidence and Recovery of Articles Under Section 27 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

The appeal arose from the conviction of the appellant, original accused no. 1, under Sections 302 and 394 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landlord's Challenge to MRT Order Granting Tenant Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Dispute Involves Agricultural Land Where MRT Overturned Concurrent Findings, Applying Deemed Tenancy Under Section 4 and Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The matter arose from a tenancy application filed by the respondent under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, seekin...