Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

3948 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3948 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder, Robbery, and House Trespass in Doctor's Killing — Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Stolen Articles Sufficient to Prove Guilt.

The appellant, Sunil Nirmal Bisth, was convicted by the learned Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.1267 of 1996 for offe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, 387, 201 read with 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances was complete and motive established.

The appellant, Raju @ Doctor Vyankatswami, along with co-accused Somnath, Rufas, Yogesh, and Naresh, was tried for offences under Sections 120-B, 364,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon held sufficient to sustain conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Jaiprakash Janbandhu, was convicted for the murder of his wife Yashodhara under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Chudaman s/o Gambhirdas Shahu, was convicted by the 6th Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur in Sessions Trial No.553/2000 for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction based solely on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances.

The appellant, Suresh Narayan Dakhore, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, for the murder of Laxman Ramkrushna Naik and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Appellant's conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of his master confirmed as chain of circumstances including motive, last seen, and recovery of weapon was complete.

The appellant, Baban Tukaram Kapse, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Wardha, for the murder of his master Govinda Ganpatrao Girde under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Hut Burning Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistent Testimony. Conviction under Section 436 IPC for mischief by fire set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kishor Marotrao Raut, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Sessions Trial No. 7/2008 for an offence punisha...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Three Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC confirmed as prosecution established chain of circumstances leading to the murder of Laik Khan.

The appellants, Arunkumar @ Kallu Rajendraprasad Pande, Ashok @ Guddu Rajendraprasad Pande, and Santosh @ Lallu Rajendraprasad Pande, were convicted b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Conviction for Theft by Clerk Under Section 381 IPC. Discovery of Stolen Property Under Section 27 Evidence Act Sufficient for Conviction in Absence of Direct Evidence.

The case involves a criminal revision filed by Sunil Madhukar Morwal against his conviction under Section 381 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for theft...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Robbery Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 394 read with 34 IPC for killing a person over a petty sum of Rs. 50.

The case pertains to the murder of Bapu Rustum Salgar on 23 October 2004. The appellants, Sanjay and Anna Upadhe, were convicted by the Additional Ses...