Search Results for "Rule Returnable"

8850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Defendants in Injunction Suit. Principle of dominus litus does not bar court from adding necessary parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC.

The petitioner, Ashok Babarao Patil, filed a Regular Civil Suit No. 209 of 2021 for a simplicitor injunction to restrain the defendants from interferi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Retired Municipal Employee Challenging Departmental Inquiry Initiated After Retirement. No Rule Permits Inquiry Against Ex-Employee Under Maharashtra Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1979.

The petitioner, Shankar Shivling Swami, was employed as a cashier in the Municipal Council, Beed. He was suspended on 16 January 1991 on a charge of m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Elected President in Municipal Council Disqualification Dispute — President Retains Authority to Preside Despite Notice of Disqualification. No Disqualification Without Final Order Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The petitioner, Dr. Gazala Yasmeen, was elected as President of Mangrulpir Municipal Council on 31st December 2016 under Section 51A1A(1) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Impounding of Document in Specific Performance Suit — No Objection Raised at Time of Exhibition. Court holds that once a document is exhibited without objection, it cannot be impounded under Section 33 of the Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 at a later stage.

The petitioner, defendant No.4 in Special Civil Suit No.167 of 2012, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 24.01.2019 passed by the 8th Jo...