Search Results for "Bombay High Court guidelines"

3150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to Office Memorandum Allowing Post Facto CRZ Clearance for Permissible Activities. Environmental Organization Contended That the 2021 Circular Contravenes Mandatory Prior Clearance Requirement Under the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986.

The present Public Interest Litigation invoked the jurisdiction of the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Conflict on Taxability of Tobacco Products to Constitution Bench for Clarification on Precedent Doctrine. Dispute Involves Whether Pan Masala Containing Tobacco Covered Under Additional Duties of Excise Act, 1957 is Exempt from State Sales Tax Under Various State Enactments.

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals concerning the taxability of pan masala containing tobacco and gutka under various State sales tax act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Division Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Municipal Corporation's Power to Regulate Hoardings on Railway Property. Petitions seek declaration that Railway Properties exempt from local authority jurisdiction under Railways Act, 1989.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of writ petitions filed by the Union of India (Western Railway) and numerous private advertising entities. The pet...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Stay of Departmental Enquiry During Criminal Trial in EPF Fraud Case. Held that departmental proceedings and criminal trial can proceed simultaneously as charges are distinct and no prejudice is caused to the delinquent employee.

The petitioner, Shiva Shankar Mamidi, a Data Processing Assistant in the Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO), challenged an interim order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...