Search Results for "record keeping"

8007 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 8007 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC. Minor's Age Proved by School Leaving Certificate and Oral Evidence, Consent Irrelevant for Rape Under Indian Penal Code.

The case arose from a criminal appeal filed by the appellant-accused challenging his conviction and sentence for offences under Sections 363, 366, and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Appeals Against Conviction for Rape and Murder and State\u2019s Appeals for Enhancement and Against Acquittal. Court Considers Circumstantial Evidence Linking Accused to Offences Under Sections 302, 376, 392, 201, 411, 414 IPC and Others.

Criminal Appeal No. 516 of 2012 was filed by accused Jawedkhan @ Tingrya against his conviction and sentence. Criminal Appeal No. 281 of 2012 and Crim...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.3013 OF 2018

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution by a co-operative housing society, a developer, and its director challenging a stop ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Legality of Stop-Work Notice Issued by MCGM Based on Naval NOC Requirement for Building Construction. Petitioners Challenged Requirement as Ultra Vires MRTP Act After Obtaining IOD and Commencement Certificate Without Such Condition.

The petitioners, a co-operative housing society and a developer, filed a writ petition under Article 226 before the Bombay High Court challenging a st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Petitions Challenging SEBI's Show Cause Notices to Auditors of Satyam Computers. Question of SEBI's Jurisdiction under Sections 11, 11B, and 11(4) of SEBI Act Raised in Wake of Satyam Fraud Disclosure.

The matter arose from writ petitions filed by Price Waterhouse & Co. and other chartered accountant firms along with individual partners challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to DNA Evidence Inconsistency and Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 376(2)(f)(l) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act set aside as DNA report excluded semen and blood of accused, and victim's testimony was tutored.

The appellant, Bhaiyya S/o Vijay Chakre, was convicted by the Special Judge, Achalpur, for offences under Section 376(2)(f)(l) of the Indian Penal Cod...