Search Results for "production before judicial officer"

1700 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1700 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit Due to Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Appellants' claim of adverse possession from 1961 fails as they did not raise the issue in lower courts and cannot produce new evidence in second appeal.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the appellants (defendants in the original suit) against a decree for possession passed by the trial court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Customs Prosecution for Export of Antiquities — Prosecution Under Customs Act Not Barred by Antiquities and Art Treasures Act, 1972. Held that the Customs Act, 1962 applies alongside the Antiquities Act, and prosecution under Sections 132 and 135 is maintainable.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Delhi High Court upholding the discharge of the respondent, Sharad Gandhi, from offences under Sections 132 an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Appeal and Cross-Objections Against Dismissal of Declaration Suit. Suit Filed by Brother of Deceased Religious Head for Declaration of Ownership of Property Allotted in 1952, Dismissed by Trial Court.

This Regular First Appeal and cross-objections arise from the judgment and decree dated 9 September 2005 passed by the Principal City Civil and Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Sufficient Material and Non-Application of Mind in Granting Approval and Sanction. Appellants Discharged Under Section 227 CrPC as Material on Record Did Not Warrant Framing of Charge Under MCOC Act.

The present appeals were filed by Sachin Bansilal Ghaiwal and Umesh Mohan Kirve, who were accused Nos. 3 and 9 respectively in a case registered under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42(2) of NDPS Act. Secret Information Not Sent to Superior Officer Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Majjidkha s/o Hanifkha Khan, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur in Special Case No.10/2004 for an offence punishable under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Intent and Absence of Public View. Alleged Caste-Based Insults in Private Field Not Attracting Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The applicants, Angadh Kadam, Rohidas Kadam, and Indrajeet Kadam, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010100302020_1

The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in SC/ST Land Grant Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition against order in Writ Petition No.7988/2002 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case arises from a review petition filed against the order dated 17.06.2013 in Writ Petition No.7988/2002. The original writ petition involved a d...