Search Results for "Central Government employee"

2192 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2192 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Reserves Orders on Company's Petition to Quash Criminal Case for Alleged Cheating of Rs 36 Crores. Commercial Property Transaction Dispute Resulted in FIR; Petitioners Claim Abuse of Process Amid Pending Civil and Insolvency Proceedings.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, filed by Patel Engineering Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Tribunal's Order for Payment of Subsistence Allowance to Suspended Railway Employee. Employer's Failure to Pay Subsistence Allowance During Suspension Period Renders Subsequent Disciplinary Proceedings Invalid.

The Union of India, through the Chief Workshop Manager of Central Railway, Parel, Mumbai, filed two writ petitions challenging orders of the Central G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Railway Employee for Overcharging Decoy Passenger in Disciplinary Proceedings. Central Administrative Tribunal's Order of Reinstatement Set Aside as Disciplinary Authority's Discretion Not Vitiated by Non-Supply of Enquiry Report.

The case involves a disciplinary action against a railway employee, Moni Shankar, who was a Booking Supervisor. He was appointed as a Trains Clerk in ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Management’s Appeal, Confirms Ex-Gratia Bonus for Workmen but Declares Strike Unjustified. Agreement Under Section 34(3) of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, Formed by Communication of Cabinet Decision; Strike During Conciliation Devoid of Justification.

The appeal arose from an industrial dispute between the Management of Fertilizer Corporation of India, a Central Government undertaking, and its workm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Employer's Writ for ABRY Scheme Benefits — Late ECR Filing Not Fatal to Claim. Clause 5 of ABRY Scheme 3.0 Interpreted as Directory, and Baseline Employees Cannot Be Reduced Retrospectively by EPFO.

The petitioner, Lakshmi Electrical Drives Corporate Services LLP, a manpower services provider in Tamil Nadu, filed a writ petition under Article 226 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Penalty on Company Officials Under CGST Act Due to Lack of Personal Liability Evidence and Procedural Flaws. Petitioners Challenge Penalty Order for Fake Input Tax Credit Allegations

The petitioners, employees of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited, filed a writ petition challenging an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 that i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of ESI Contributions Paid Under Mistake of Law — Employer Entitled to Restitution Under Section 72 of Indian Contract Act. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Claim for Refund Under Section 75 of ESI Act, 1948.

The petitioners, M/s. Indian Hotels Co. Limited (owner of Taj Mahal Hotel and Taj Intercontinental) and its shareholder, filed a writ petition seeking...