Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"

5358 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5358 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Cess Paid Under Protest in Excise Matter — Unjust Enrichment Principle Not Applicable to Cess Under IDR Act. Section 11-B of Central Excise Act Held Inapplicable to Cess Collected Under Industries (Development and Regulation) Act, 1951, and Refund Directed with Interest.

26 Apr 2005

The petitioners, Shree Vidhya Paper Mills and Mr. Rameshwarlal Motilal, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court seeking refund of Rs. 10,19,246...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 17 OF 2004

9 Aug 2010

The judgment pertains to four writ petitions filed by international airlines—Malaysian Airlines, Saudi Arabian Airlines, North West Airlines, and Ke...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Stranger's Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree Execution Due to Lack of Legal Right and Suppression of Facts. Objection Based on Oral Assurance from Tenant Fails as No Documentary Evidence Produced Under Hyderabad Rent Control Act, 1954, and Execution Proceedings Must Proceed as Per Decree.

30 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from the execution of an eviction decree ordered by the High Court in 2011, originating from eviction proceedings initiated in 1992 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Employees Due to Wrong Fixation of Pay Scales. The Court held that recovery is permissible when the employee had knowledge of the error or when the mistake is a continuing wrong, and the principle of no recovery does not apply in such cases.

18 Jan 2019

The petitioners, 13 employees of Thane Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the Corporation's decision to recover excess salary pa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Police Patil Challenging Cancellation of Kerosene Retail Licence. Police Patil is not a Government Servant and is Permitted to Engage in Local Business Under Rule 8 of the Maharashtra Village Police Patil Rules, 1968.

31 Aug 2012

The petitioner, Ishwar S/o Vithalrao Mohite, is a Police Patil and has been running a retail kerosene shop in village Ghodki, Tq. Washi, Dist. Osmanab...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Cooperative Bank's Writ Petitions Challenging Recovery Certificate and Auction Sale — Upholds Validity of Sale Certificate Issued Under Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960. The court held that the sale certificate under Section 99 is conclusive evidence of title and the recovery certificate under Section 101 is final and binding, barring writ jurisdiction.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Sangli Sahakari Bank Ltd., a cooperative bank registered under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, filed three writ petit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Full Bench of the Bombay High Court Considers Reference on Interpretation of Clauses 96 and 97 of MCGM General Conditions of Contract. The Court Examines Whether Compliance with Clause 96 is a Precondition for Invoking Arbitration under Clause 97.

8 Feb 2017

The appeal arose from an arbitration petition concerning a contractual dispute between a contractor and the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (M...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Revision Petition Challenging Return of Section 34 Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction — Holds That Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Contract and Prior Section 9 Filing at Salem Confer Jurisdiction on Salem Courts Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

21 Apr 2026

The revision petitioner, Waterbury Farrel, a division of Magnum Integrated Technologies Inc., Canada, filed Arb.O.P.No.103 of 2019 before the Principa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Land Acquisition Due to 38-Year Delay and Laches. Consent terms entered by petitioner's father in 1966 binding on petitioner; possession taken in 1972; petition filed in 2010 without explanation.

17 Mar 2025

The petitioner, Abhay V. Khinvasara, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the acquisition of land bearing ...

92 93 94 95 96

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)