Search Results for "statutory deposit"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "statutory deposit"

3428 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3428 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Considers Second Appeals on Maintainability of Civil Suits Involving Electricity Tariff Dispute – Core Issue Is Bar on Civil Court Jurisdiction Under Section 145 of the Electricity Act, 2003

31 Oct 2025

The appellants, who were plaintiffs in the original suits, filed four separate suits (O.S. Nos. 613/2013, 612/2013, 610/2013, and 611/2013) before the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Jurisdiction for Section 34 Challenge to MSMED Act Award Is Governed by Section 18(4) of MSMED Act, Not by Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Agreement. The non obstante provision in Section 18(4) overrides the arbitration agreement, and the Section 34 petition must be filed at the place where the supplier is located.

16 Oct 2024

The case involves a reference to a Larger Bench of the Bombay High Court to resolve a conflict between two Single Judge decisions regarding the jurisd...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlord's Petition Challenging Reduction of Standard Rent in Cinema Premises Lease. Standard Rent Fixed at Rs. 1,000 per Month Based on Valuation Evidence Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947.

5 Dec 2024

The case involves a dispute between a landlord (Petitioner) and a tenant (Respondent) over the fixation of standard rent for a cinema premises in Chem...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that pre-amended provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 apply to arbitration requests received before 23rd October, 2015, and the High Court must respect the agreed appointment procedure.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — Pre-Amendment Act Applies; No Claim Certificate Does Not Bar Arbitration; Mutually Agreed Procedure Must Be Respected

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where requests for arbitration were made before the Amendment Act, 2015 came into force, the pre-amended provisions apply, and the High Court must respect the agreed procedure for appointment of arbitrator under Clause 64(3) of GCC.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court considered a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6)...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — High Court Erred in Applying Amended Act and Appointing Independent Arbitrator Without Adhering to Mutually Agreed Procedure. The Court held that where parties have agreed on a procedure for appointment of arbitrator, the court must respect it unless bias or failure is shown.

29 Mar 2019

The Supreme Court heard a batch of appeals arising from orders of the Rajasthan High Court appointing independent arbitrators under Section 11(6) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against Directors in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Specific Averments of Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 of NI Act. The court held that mere description as director without specific averments of being in charge of and responsible for the conduct of business is insufficient to attract vicarious liability under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

19 Aug 2022

The applicants, Nizar Noorali Rangara and another, were directors of M/s. Rangara Industries Private Limited, a company in liquidation. The respondent...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision That Insurance Charges Not Part of Sale Price Under CST Act — Parties' Intention Governs Includibility. The court held that insurance charges collected separately and not intended by parties to be part of sale price are not includible under section 2(h) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

18 Jun 2010

The case involves a reference under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, by the Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, seeking the High Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Breach of Trust Charges Against Directors in PF Default Case — Mere Delay in Depositing Provident Fund Amount Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach of Trust Under Section 406 IPC. Explanation 1 to Section 405 IPC Requires Dishonest Misappropriation or Conversion, Not Mere Retention or Delay.

8 May 2012

The petitioners, Noshir Adi Soonawala, Ratan Naval Tata, Pratap Bhogilal, and Sudhir Thackersey, were original accused Nos.5, 7, 2, and 8 respectively...

91 92 93 94 95

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)