Search Results for "investigation time limit"

1014 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1014 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR in Robbery Case Due to Compromise Between Parties — Section 482 CrPC Allows Quashing of Non-Compoundable Offences When Settlement is Genuine and Voluntary.

The applicant, Mohd. Muddasar Ansari, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Licensee in Essential Commodities Act Case for Lack of Mandatory Sanction. Prosecution for Illegal Diesel Transportation Fails as No Sanction Under Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955 Was Obtained.

The petitioner, Sadiq Pasha, a licensed transporter of diesel and operator of SWS & Sons Petrol Bunk, challenged the FIR in Crime No.137/2022 register...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Anticipatory Bail Application Maintainable Despite Applicant's Custody in Another Crime. Section 438 CrPC Does Not Bar a Person Already Arrested in a Different Case from Seeking Pre-Arrest Bail.

The applicant, Amar S. Mulchandani, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 CrPC in connection with C.R.No.806 of 2019 registered at ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes POCSO Proceedings Against Accused Due to Lack of Prima Facie Case and False Implication. Allegations of Sexual Assault on Minor Found Baseless as Medical Evidence and Conduct of Complainant Contradicted FIR.

The petitioner, Krishnappa, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of proceedings...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 IPC and 6 of POCSO Act set aside as victim's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support prosecution case.

The appellant, Sri Paramesha, was convicted by the Additional Sessions and Special Judge, Hassan in Special Case No.146/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Conviction in Consumer Protection Act Penalty Case for Violation of Summary Trial Procedure. Failure to Record Plea and Conduct Trial as Per Sections 254 and 262 CrPC Renders Proceedings Void.

The petitioner, Suhas Ratnakar Morey, was convicted by the Maharashtra State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (State Commission) under Section 2...