Search Results for "distinction between public order and law and order"

3267 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3267 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Confirmation Case and Appeal of Police Naik in Mass Killing Incident — Review of Death Sentence Under Section 302 IPC. Court Examines Whether Firing by SRPF Officer at Village Keshori Resulting in Five Deaths Constitutes Offence Punishable with Capital Punishment.

The matter concerned a confirmation case and criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, which convicted and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Chamber Summons Filed by Defendant for Return of Plaint in Suit for Damages Under Lease Agreement. Application Seeks Transfer to Chennai Court Citing Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause; Court Also Considers Limitation and Cause of Action.

The matter pertained to a chamber summons filed by the defendant in a suit for damages. The defendant, Integrated Finance Co. Ltd., sought return of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows IRCTC's Appeals in Catering Contract Dispute, Restricts Interference Under Sections 34 and 37 of Arbitration Act. Court holds that High Court erred in re-appreciating evidence and substituting its own view over arbitrator's findings on tariff revision.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Indian Railways Catering and Tourism Corporation Ltd. (IRCTC) and other parties, setting aside the Delh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petition for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action in Gadchiroli-Chimur Lok Sabha Constituency Dispute. Alleged Discrepancy of 62 Votes in Final Tally Does Not Constitute a Cause of Action Under Section 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Dr. Rameshkumar Bapuraoji Gajbe, contested the election to the 17th Lok Sabha from the Gadchiroli-Chimur Constituency as a candidate o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...