Search Results for "Unreasonable Delay"

1760 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1760 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay (Aurangabad Bench) Decides Criminal Appeals Against Conviction and Acquittal in Land Dispute Murder Case. Convicted Accused Under Sections 147, 148, 302, 324, 325 read with 149 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act Appeal; State Challenges Acquittal of Co-Accused on Same Charges.

The case arose from a land dispute in village Yelamwadi, Tq. Chakur, Dist. Latur. Muktabai, the complainant, lived with her husband and children. Her ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Oral Judgment on Sanction of Scheme of Arrangement Amid BIFR Pendency. Maintainability Under Sections 391 and 394 of Companies Act, 1956 Against Overriding Effect of Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 Considered.

The petitioner, Ashok Organics Industries Ltd., incorporated in 1973, filed a petition under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Challenge to Revocation of Electricity Duty Exemption for Educational Institutions by State Government. Petitioners Seek Quashing of Government Communication and Levy of Duty Under Maharashtra Electricity Duty Act, 1958; Court Issues Rule.

The petitioners, comprising 10 educational institutions managed by a charitable trust, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision Quashing Commissioner’s Revisional Order in Land Revenue Matter; Commissioner’s Delayed Revisional Exercise Under Section 211 Bombay Land Revenue Code, 1879 Deemed Unreasonable

The case arose from an application by Patel Raghav Natha, an occupant of agricultural land in Rajkot, seeking permission under section 65 of the Bomba...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Directs Expeditious Disposal of Applications Under Section 28A of Land Acquisition Act Pending Before Authorities. Applications for Re-determination of Compensation Based on Court Awards Not Yet Decided; Outer Time Limit of Six Months Set for Completion of Enquiry.

This batch of writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India sought a direction from the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at A...