Search Results for "Tribunal Award Modified"

1945 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1945 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation for Injured Vegetable Vendor in Motor Accident Claim — Future Prospects and Correct Multiplier Applied. Tribunal's failure to add 40% future income and use of multiplier 17 instead of 18 for a 20-year-old claimant corrected under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellant, Rameshbhai Dahyabhai Dantani, filed a First Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and awar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Enhances Compensation for Injured Driver in Motor Accident Case — Future Prospects Added to Income Calculation. The Court held that income must be assessed based on the latest income tax return and 40% future prospects must be added for self-employed persons aged about 40 years.

The appellant, Mahebub Kasambhai Bogha, an injured claimant, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the judgm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Death of Babulal Jainapur in Road Traffic Accident — Multiplier Corrected from 13 to 14 and Future Prospects Added. Claimants awarded Rs.24,52,500/- with interest at 6% per annum under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the claimants, who are the mother, wife, and two children of the deceased Babulal Jainapur, seeking enhancement of compensatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim for Deceased Employee Aged 19 Years. Compensation Enhanced from Rs.5,31,000 to Rs.14,82,000 by Applying Multiplier of 18 and Adding 40% Future Prospects Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appellants, parents of deceased Harshal Vinaybhai Desai, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the j...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Upholds Compensation Award. Settlement induced by fear of delayed justice is not voluntary and cannot be accepted.

The case arises from a motor accident claim where the deceased, Atish Ramesh Kamble, a 25-year-old bachelor employed as a lecturer earning Rs.24,800 p...