KAHC020042082025_1
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Three Years"
20186 result(s) found
Found 20186 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay: Outcome Not Mentioned in Writ Petition Challenging Regulation of Purse Seine Fishing. The Court examined the constitutional validity of the February 5, 2016 order under section 4(1) of the Maharashtra Marine Fishing Regulation Act, 1981 and its compliance with Articles 14, 19(1)(g), and 21.
20 Oct 2021The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by five petitioners representing 222 persons engaged in purse seine fishing...
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition in Principal's Retirement Extension Case — Compensation Enhanced for Wrongful Deprivation of Consideration. Management's failure to conduct performance review for extension of retirement age from 62 to 65 years under Government Resolution dated 5 March 2011 held violative of petitioner's right, but reinstatement not possible due to age; compensation of three months' salary and costs enhanced to full salary and allowances for three years.
7 Oct 2023The petitioner, Dr. Rajendra Dagdulal Kankariya, a professor and former principal, challenged the judgment of the Mumbai University and College Tribun...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award on Wage Parity for Mumbai Workers. Court holds that Tribunal erred in granting wage parity between Mumbai and Taloja units without considering financial capacity and other relevant factors under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Jul 2019The case involves two writ petitions arising from an award of the Industrial Tribunal in a wage dispute between VVF Limited Employees' Union (the Unio...
- 109
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rape of Minor Daughter but Acquits Accused of Murder and Forgery Charges Due to Lack of Evidence. The court confirmed the conviction under Section 376(2)(c) IPC based on the sole testimony of the victim, applying the presumption under Section 114-A of the Evidence Act, 1872.
2 Sep 2014The case involves three criminal appeals arising from Sessions Case No. 42/2002 decided by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada on 17-01-2012. The a...
- 61
High Court
Madras High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Land Assignments. Challenge to Commissioner of Land Administration's Order Dated 04.05.2023 Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
19 Mar 2025The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenged the order dated 04.05.2023 passed by the Commissioner of Land Administrati...
- 44
High Court
Bombay High Court Rejects Plaint in Property Suit as Barred by Limitation — Failure to Disclose Cause of Action Within Three Years of Knowledge of Alleged Fraud Leads to Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC. The court held that the plaintiff's knowledge of the alleged fraud in 2015 or earlier triggered the limitation period under Article 58 of the Limitation Act, 1963, and the suit filed in 2021 was beyond the prescribed period.
18 Jul 2022The plaintiff, Ramesh Mali, filed a suit seeking declaration and injunction in respect of certain properties originally owned by his deceased father, ...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Directs Grant of Higher Pay Scale to Non-Teaching Employees of Ashram School Under Government Resolutions. Petitioners Sought Higher Pay Scale After 10 and 20 Years of Service; Court Directed Respondent to Consider Representation in Light of GRs and Previous Judgment.
15 Feb 2023The petitioners, four non-teaching employees of Shri Chhkradhar Swami Prathamik Ashram School in Mendha, Bhandara, filed a writ petition under Article...
- 20
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Court upholds lower appellate court's decree confirming plaintiff's title and possession based on sale deed and adverse possession.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, arising from a property dispute. The original plaintiff (sin...
- 177
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Latur, dismissi...
- 134
