Search Results for "grounds not pressed"

2088 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2088 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and concurrent.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 12.4.2005 passed by the First Additional ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Hears Criminal Appeal Challenging Conviction for Rape of Cousin Sister Resulting in Pregnancy. DNA Report Established Accused and Victim as Biological Parents of Child Born Under Sections 376, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) Indian Penal Code.

The appeal arises from a judgment of conviction rendered by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha in Sessions Case No. 55 of 2020 dated 20.8.2022. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeal, Dismisses Suit for Cancellation of Partition Deed Due to Failure to Prove Duress. Power of Attorney Holder Cannot Testify on Party's State of Mind; Adverse Inference Drawn Against Plaintiff for Non-Examination.

The litigation arose out of a suit filed by the father against his daughter-in-law seeking cancellation of a partition deed and perpetual injunction. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority Failed to Independently Consider Grounds, Leading to Mechanical Affirmation of Proposal.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Janardan @ Janyadada Chintaman Bhoir, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 read with 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 set aside as prosecution failed to prove last seen theory and recovery of weapon beyond reasonable doubt.

The appeal arises from the conviction of Rajendra Eknath Apugade and Arjun Vasant Falake (original accused Nos. 1 and 2) by the Additional Sessions Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Pensionary Benefits of Retired Lecturer Under Maharashtra Pension Rules. Petitioner entitled to regular pension, gratuity, commutation, and leave encashment with interest for 30 years 1 month of service in aided colleges.

The petitioner, Dr. (Mrs.) Parvathi Venkatesh, a retired lecturer aged about 60 years, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...