Search Results for "criminal trial standard"

1901 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1901 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Violation of Detenu's Right to Lead Oral Evidence Before Advisory Board. Failure to Inform Detenu of Right to Produce Witnesses Renders Detention Invalid.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vishal Salunke, challenged the detention order dated 9th August 2017 passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused Head Constable for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Girl. Evidence of Victim and Medical Reports Proved Rape Without Consent and Victim's Age Below 16 Years Made Consent Irrelevant Under Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(a) and 323 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The case involved a criminal appeal before the Bombay High Court against the conviction of a head constable for kidnapping and raping a minor girl. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Victim's Age. Conviction under Section 376(1) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim was a child under POCSO Act.

The appellant, Prashant Korwate, was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 376(1) IPC read with Section 3 punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Against Acquittal in Kidnapping Case Due to Unreliable Evidence. Court held that the prosecution failed to prove the offence of kidnapping for ransom under Section 364-A IPC beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the acquittal of five respondents (original accused) for offences under Sections 363 and 364-A read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Age of Victim. Conviction under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 4 POCSO Act set aside as prosecution failed to establish victim's minority and guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Siddharth @ Bollywood S/o Bapurao Meshram, was convicted by the Special Judge, Wardha for offences under Section 376(2)(i) IPC, Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direction for Voice Sample Collection in Bribery Investigation — Rejects Article 20(3) Challenge. Court holds that giving voice sample does not amount to testimonial compulsion and is permissible during investigation under Section 311A CrPC.

The petitioner, Madhukar K. Farde, an Assistant PF Commissioner and Recovery Officer, was accused by the CBI of demanding a bribe of Rs.1,00,000 from ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Issues Guidelines for Detention of Overstaying Foreign Nationals in Suo Motu Writ Petition. Court directs State of Goa to establish detention centres and formulate standard operating procedures for handling foreign nationals who overstay their visas.

The Bombay High Court at Goa took suo motu cognizance of the issue of overstaying foreign nationals in the State of Goa, arising from a criminal writ ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Under Section 302 IPC Based on Eyewitness Testimony. Daughter's Testimony and Medical Evidence Confirm Fatal Assault by Husband.

The appellant, Raju Waman Salve, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Kirti, and sentenced to life imp...