Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

3940 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3940 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Saleem Pasha, was convicted by the II Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in S.C.No.611/2010 for the offence punishabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Guilt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Chain of Circumstances Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammed Rafeeq @ Patan, was convicted by the Fast Track Court-XV, Bangalore in Sessions Case No.881/2009 for the murder of his wife un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Huligappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Bagalkot, in S.C. No. 27/2011 for offences under Sections 498A and 302 IPC for the alle...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The judgment pertains to two criminal appeals filed by the original accused No.1 (Shafi Nabab Sayyed) and accused No.2 (Asim Jamaloddin Momin) challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No.3 in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Evidence and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC, While Acquittal of Co-Accused Upheld for Lack of Evidence.

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kolhapur, dated 7th April 2003, in Sessions Case ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Child Witness Testimony and Circumstantial Evidence. Five-year-old daughter's ocular evidence corroborated by overwhelming circumstances including extra-judicial confession and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Dilip Dnyanoba Ghaware, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Savita, and sentenced to l...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Penalty Case — CESTAT Order Upheld. Penalty under Rule 209A of Central Excise Rules, 1944 set aside for lack of evidence of aiding and abetting.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai, against the orders of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and House Trespass in Love Marriage Dispute — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of his son-in-law and under Section 449 IPC for house trespass, with concurrent sentences.

The appellant, Balkrishna Khashaba Mohite, was convicted by the Sessions Court at Satara for the murder of Sunil Kakade, his son-in-law, under Section...