Search Results for "agricultural lands"

2186 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2186 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years Due to Inordinate Delay. Suo Moto Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Held Invalid for Lack of Reasonable Time and Violation of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Dyanoba S/o Bapurao Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner's Challenge to Reopening of Ceiling Proceedings After 15 Years. Inordinate Delay and Violation of Natural Justice Render Suo Motu Revision Under Section 45(2) of Maharashtra Agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act, 1961 Unsustainable.

The petitioner, Madan Shendge, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 20th April 1992 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Aurangabad Div...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

APPEAL FROM ORDER NO. 835 OF 2022

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, owners of land acquired for road construction in Margao, Goa, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer at R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Disturbed Under Section 100 CPC. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession filed by the respondents (original plaintiffs) against the appellants (original defendants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Suit — Finds Lower Appellate Court Failed to Consider Evidence Properly Under Section 100 CPC. The Court held that the first appellate court must independently assess evidence and cannot merely affirm the trial court's findings without proper reasoning.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the 2nd Ad-hoc Additional District ...