Search Results for "Trust objects"

965 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 965 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Prosecution's case based on last seen theory and recovery of weapon found insufficient to convict accused under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Udupi (sitting at Kundapura) i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rape and Poisoning Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 376 and 328 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Sheshappa Gowda, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge and Special Judge, Dakshina Kannada, Mangalore in Spl.Case No.4/2008...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Acquittal of Accused Under Section 302 IPC Upheld Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive.

The State of Karnataka, through H.D. Kote Police Station, filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Rudresh, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track Court), Chitradurga in S.C.No.23/2011 for offences under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Appellate Court's Finding of Adverse Possession. The court held that the appellants failed to prove title and that the respondents had perfected title by adverse possession over the suit property.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed by the appellants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 144, 147, 148, 341, 114, 201 read with 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Manjunatha and Prabhakar, were convicted by the Fast Track Court, KGF, for offences under Sections 143, 144, 147, 148, 447, 341, 114, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Revision, Rejects Plaint in Specific Performance Suit Involving New Tenure Land. Agreement to Sell New Tenure Land Without Collector's Permission is Void Under Section 43 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, and Suit Based on Such Agreement is Barred by Law.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by the original defendants (Dilipbhai Parshottambhai Patel and others) against an order of the le...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Rejection of Impleadment in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Held That Impleadment Cannot Be Used to Settle Factional Disputes of a Society Without Direct Interest in Suit Property.

The case involves two appeals (O.S.A. Nos. 32 and 46 of 2026) arising from a suit (C.S. No. 873 of 2018) filed by Kanthakotta Ayira Vysiya Veri Chetti...