Search Results for "Section 173, Motor Vehicles Act"

1195 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1195 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Erroneous Income Assessment. Income Tax Returns Filed After Death of Deceased Cannot Be Sole Basis for Determining Income Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the Award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Tribunal's use of multiplier '13' for a 61-year-old claimant was contrary to Sarla Verma v. DTC guidelines; correct multiplier is '9'.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the judgment and award dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim for Pillion Rider Death — Notional Income Increased from Rs. 8,000 to Rs. 10,000 per Month. The Court applied 40% prospective income, multiplier 18, and enhanced conventional heads under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal arises from a judgment and award dated 01.08.2025 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Auxi.), Nadiad in Motor Acc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Case — Insurance Company's Appeal Dismissed. Multiplier applied as per age of deceased, not claimant, for loss of dependency under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The judgment arises from two connected appeals under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award dated 15.12.2012 in MVC No. 763...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Insurance Company's Failure to Prove Policy Cancellation. Dishonour of Cheque for Premium Does Not Automatically Terminate Insurance Contract Without Proper Notice to Insured and Third Parties.

The appeal was filed by the original claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, aggrieved by the judgment of the Motor Accident Clai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows BMTC Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased Motorcyclist. Liability Apportioned Equally Between BMTC and Deceased, Compensation Reduced to Rs.39,55,000/- with 6% Interest.

The appeal was filed by the Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.09.2016 passed by the IX A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Deceased's Income as Shikshan Sewak Assessed at Rs.19,000 per Month Based on 6th Pay Commission. Compensation of Rs.44,21,000 Upheld as Just and Proper.

The case involves an appeal filed by Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award o...