Search Results for "1982"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "1982"

3317 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3317 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Inordinate Delay in Passing Detention Order — Live and Proximate Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982. Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Renders Detention Invalid.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Mohankumar @ Raja, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Live Link Snapped Between Grounds and Purpose of Detention. Unexplained delay of 54 days between arrest and detention order renders detention invalid under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, sister of the detenu Manikandan @ Pambu Mani, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissione...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Inordinate Delay — Unexplained Delay of 54 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Kalavathi, sister of the detenu Iyyappan, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition in Goonda Detention Case Due to Unexplained Delay — Detention Order Quashed as Live and Proximate Link Snapped. Preventive detention under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 held invalid where 54-day delay between arrest and detention order remained unexplained, following Sushanta Kumar Banik v. State of Tripura.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Kumar, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Avad...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under Act 14 of 1982. Detention Order Quashed Due to Lack of Proximity Between Adverse Cases and Ground Case, and Failure to Establish Public Disorder.

21 Jan 2025

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Sureshbabu, filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention order dated 23.12.2024 passed by the Distri...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Preventive Detention Order in NDPS Case Due to Non-Commercial Quantity and Lack of Proximity of Adverse Cases. The detention order under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 branding the detenu as a 'Goonda' was set aside as the drug involved was not commercial quantity and adverse cases lacked proximity, making ordinary law sufficient.

20 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Vijayalakshmi, mother of the detenu Sivakumar @ Kittu Poonai, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of ...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract for Sale of Agricultural Land.

20 Jan 2025

The appellant/plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant B...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Agreement of Sale Not Proved as Plaintiff Failed to Show Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

20 Jan 2025

The plaintiff Palanivel filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated February 22, 2008, whereby the first defendant Balasubrama...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows TIIC's Recovery Petition Against Guarantors in SFC Act Case — Guarantors Held Jointly and Severally Liable Despite Company's Winding Up. Liability of Guarantors Under Sections 31(a) and 31(aa) of State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 Survives Liquidation of Principal Borrower and Receipt of Amount from Official Liquidator.

7 Jan 2025

The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Industrial Investment Corporation Limited (TIIC), a State Financial Corporation, filed an original petition under Sections ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Final Decree Application in Mortgage Suit Despite Limitation — Time Spent in Earlier Litigation Excluded Under Section 14 of Limitation Act. The court held that the plaintiff's final decree application was within limitation as the period during which the defendant challenged the ex parte decree was excluded under Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

29 Jan 2026

The case arises from a mortgage suit filed by M/s. Visu Financiers (plaintiff) against G. Sundararaj (defendant) for recovery of money due on a mortga...

90 91 92 93 94

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)