Search Results for "market value compensation"

1520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows State's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Reduced from Rs. 200 to Rs. 150 per sq.meter. Comparable Sale Instances of Small Plots Require Deduction for Development When Applied to Large Acquisitions Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Reference Court in Land Reference No. 1 of 1987, which had enhanced the compensation for...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case: Investment in Shares of Private Company for Acquiring Control Held as Capital Asset, Not Stock-in-Trade. Shares held for 31 months with transfer restrictions cannot be treated as trading asset under Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appellant, Accra Investments Private Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 25 April 2012 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses NOIDA's Appeals Against Quashing of Land Acquisition Notifications and Compensation Direction. Acquisition Notifications Quashed Due to Illegal Dispensation of Section 5A Inquiry Under Section 17 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) against the Allahabad High Court's judgment quashing land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Already Adequate. Market Value of Acquired Land at Rs.120 per sq.m. Was Higher Than Comparable Sale Instances.

The appellant, Jagdish Shriram Poddar, owned agricultural lands bearing survey nos. 22/1 and 22/4, area 1.51 HR, at Mouja Chichala, Wardha. For constr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals, Upholding Tax Deduction at Source Under Section 194H on Discounts to Distributors. Relationship Between Telecom Companies and Distributors Held to Be Principal-Agent, Making Discounts Liable as Commission for Tax Deduction Purposes.

Multiple telecom companies, including Bharti Airtel Limited, Vodafone Essar South Limited, and Tata Teleservices Limited, filed appeals under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Telecom Companies' Appeals on Section 194H TDS Liability Against Distributors. Discounts to Channel Partners Held as Commission, Mandating Tax Deduction Under Agency Relationship.

The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of appeals by telecom companies challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders confirming their liability ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...