KAHC020054492024_1
26 Jul 2024The petitioner, Smt. Baligar Chandbi, was appointed as a contract Accountant at Raitha Samparka Kendra, Huvinahadagali, through an outsourcing agency ...
Search Results for "long term agreement"
2002 result(s) found
Found 2002 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Government Waiver of Cooperative Societies' NOC for MHADA Redevelopment. The impugned communication deleted the condition requiring consent of all 17 housing societies under Clause 7(b) of Regulation 33(5) of DCPR 2034 in the context of redevelopment of dilapidated buildings.
28 Jan 2026Background: The case concerns the redevelopment of 17 residential buildings owned by the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) at...
- 86
High Court
Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Recall of Tender for Mine Operator Under Section 14 of Karnataka Transparency in Public Procurement Act, 1999. Court Examines Whether Lowest Bidder Has Vested Right and Whether Conviction of Ex-Directors Justifies Cancellation.
16 Mar 2023The Karnataka Power Corporation Limited (the Corporation) issued a notice inviting tender on 02.12.2020 for the selection of a Mine Operator for the d...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition by Deutsche Bank Against Finolex Industries Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 — Disputed Derivative Transaction Debt Precludes Summary Winding-Up. Court Holds That Winding-Up Petition Is Not a Debt Recovery Mechanism and Dismisses Petition with Costs.
28 Mar 2014The judgment arises from a Company Petition filed by Deutsche Bank AG, Mumbai Branch, seeking winding-up of Finolex Industries Limited under Section 4...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in MRTU & PULP Act Case Concerning Termination of Temporary Workers. Termination Held Not Retrenchment, Falling Under Section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act as Employment Was Under Fixed-Term Contracts.
26 Oct 2016The writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution against the Industrial Court's order dated 23.12.1999 which confirmed the Labour Cou...
- 33
High Court
High Court of Bombay examines challenge to Industrial Court order that dismissed revision applications against Labour Court’s dismissal of complaints alleging unfair labour practices under Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act. The lower courts held that complaints were not maintainable under Item 1 of Schedule IV, being more appropriately under Item 6, and that termination of services was by efflux of time under contract, not retrenchment requiring compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act.
26 Oct 2016The dispute arose from complaints filed by sixteen women packers employed on temporary basis by a pharmaceutical company since 1985. They alleged that...
- 43
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds KERC Regulations on Renewable Purchase Obligation for Captive Users. Regulations Requiring Captive Power Producers to Purchase Renewable Energy or Certificates Are Within Jurisdiction Under Electricity Act, 2003.
2 Apr 2014The petitioners, The South Indian Sugar Mills Association and Davangere Sugar Company Pvt. Ltd. (in W.P.Nos.7603-04/2012) and Shree Renuka Sugar Mills...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Bombay Hears Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Laundry Contract. Petition Questions Recovery Rate for Lost Linen, Delay Penalty, Penalty Cap, and Fixed Cost Compensation Under the Arbitration Act, 1996.
21 Nov 2025The Central Railway filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award dated 7 March 2024 ...
- 241
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petitions and Civil Revision Application Challenging Execution of Decree for Specific Performance; Executing Court Had Directed Sale Deed Execution. The dispute arose from a decree in First Appeal No. 790 of 1991 requiring deposit of consideration and execution of sale deed of about 18.07 acres land at Mouza Dhaba, Nagpur.
6 Jan 2011The matter comprised three connected proceedings—Writ Petition Nos. 113 and 1691 of 2010, and Civil Revision Application No. 76 of 2009—filed befo...
- 27
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Case on Dividend Distribution Tax Rate. DDT under Section 115-O is a tax on the company, not on shareholders, and the India-UK DTAA does not provide a lower rate for DDT.
27 Apr 2026The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of seven appeals filed by Foseco India Ltd. under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenging a comm...
- 207
