Search Results for "limited review"

4041 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4041 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator in Arbitration Petition Under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Disputes arose from Construction Management Agreements regarding completion notices and fee obligations, with the court determining arbitration under those agreements was appropriate.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with two arbitration petitions filed by DLF Home Developers Limited (DHDL) under Section 11(6) read with Section 11(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Application Challenging Restoration of Suit in Property Dispute — Plaint Not Barred by Res Judicata or Specific Relief Act. New Cause of Action Arising from Assignment of Lease Justifies Fresh Declaratory Suit Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC.

The case involves a long-standing property dispute over a plot of land in Naigaon, Dadar, Mumbai. The original lessee, Goswami Maharaj, granted a 999-...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes High Court's Retrospective Enhancement of Retirement Age in Service Regulations Case. High Court Exceeded Judicial Review Limits by Ordering Retrospective Effect from 2002 for Age Enhancement Under UP Industrial Area Development Act, 1976 and NOIDA Regulations, 1981.

The dispute arose from the enhancement of the retirement age for employees of the New Okhla Industrial Development Authority (NOIDA) from 58 to 60 yea...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging MSEDCL Tender Process for Composite Power Procurement. Court holds that tender conditions requiring composite bids for thermal and solar power are valid and do not violate Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Rajesh Sharma, the General Secretary of the Maharashtra Pradesh Congress Committee, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before th...