High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "Section 12(1)"
2086 result(s) found
Found 2086 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, Heard Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Crop Insurance Dues as Land Revenue Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The Court Examined Whether Amounts Due Under Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojna Could Be Recovered as Arrears of Land Revenue Under Section 2(19) of the MLR Code.
12 Sep 2025The present matter before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad concerned a writ petition filed by a general insurance company a...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Sets Aside Compensation Awards in Motor Accident Claim, Remands for Fresh Assessment of Income of Deceased Employed Abroad. The Court held that the High Court erred in relying on an unproven letter to determine income at $6,700 per month, and directed reassessment of income based on proper evidence under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
4 Sep 2020The case arises from a motor vehicle accident on 18 November 1998 in which Satpal Singh, a resident of Doha, Qatar since 1984, died after his scooter ...
- 214
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit — Petitioner's Right to be Heard as Necessary Party Upheld Under Order 1 Rule 10 CPC.
30 Sep 2014The petitioner, Dattatraya S/o Laxman Anandkar, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Civil Judge, Junior Division, Shrigonda, dated 30/0...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Government Officials in Cheating Case — Allegations of Misappropriation of Funds for Temple Construction Do Not Constitute Criminal Offence. Court holds that mere breach of contract or failure to fulfill promise does not attract criminal liability under Sections 406, 420 IPC without dishonest intention from inception.
30 Nov -0001The judgment pertains to three criminal writ petitions filed by government officials (Surendra Tukaram Mane, Dinkar Sakharam Nagare, and Dhondiba Hira...
- 70
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Dispute Over Commission Paid to General Manager. Expenditure disallowed as excess over reasonable remuneration was not laid out wholly for business purposes under Section 10(2)(xv) of the Income-tax Act, 1922.
2 Aug 1968This appeal arose from an income-tax assessment where the assessee, a woollen manufacturer, had appointed one V as General Manager. The terms of appoi...
- 49
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Assessee's Appeal in LPG Bottling Deduction Case — Bottling of LPG Gas Does Not Amount to Manufacture or Production Under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Court held that mere bottling of LPG gas without any change in its essential character does not constitute manufacture or production, and thus the assessee is not entitled to deduction under Section 80IB.
7 Oct 2013The assessee, M/s Puttur Petro Products Pvt Ltd, an LPG bottling company, filed an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the ...
- 114
High Court
KAHC010645132024_1
19 Dec 2025The present batch of writ appeals is directed against a common order dated 26.09.2024 passed by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnatak...
- 37
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Election Petitions Challenging Returned Candidate's Scheduled Caste Status in Latur Parliamentary Constituency. Court holds that caste validity certificate issued by Scrutiny Committee is conclusive and cannot be collaterally challenged in election petition under Section 100 of Representation of the People Act, 1951.
10 Sep 2024The judgment concerns two election petitions filed under Section 80 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, challenging the election of Dr. Shi...
- 638
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Award for Violation of Mandatory 30-Day Notice Period Under Section 21(2) of RFCTLARR Act, 2013. Failure to Provide Minimum Notice and Personal Hearing Vitiates the Award Despite Filing of Objections.
7 Mar 2025The petitioners, Shree Nasik Panchavati Panjrapole and its trustees, challenged the land acquisition award dated 23 November 2023 passed by the Distri...
- 1091
